Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] rust: init: add initialization macros

From: Benno Lossin
Date: Thu Mar 30 2023 - 11:39:31 EST


On 30.03.23 16:21, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On 3/30/23 00:33, y86-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Benno Lossin <y86-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the following initializer macros:
>> - `#[pin_data]` to annotate structurally pinned fields of structs,
>> needed for `pin_init!` and `try_pin_init!` to select the correct
>> initializer of fields.
>> - `pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with the
>> `Infallible` error type.
>> - `try_pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with a custom
>> error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).
>> - `init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with the
>> `Infallible` error type.
>> - `try_init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with a custom
>> error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).
>>
>> Also add their needed internal helper traits and structs.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <y86-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> +/// ```rust
>> +/// # #![allow(clippy::disallowed_names, clippy::new_ret_no_self)]
>> +/// # use kernel::{init, pin_init, prelude::*, init::*};
>> +/// # use core::pin::Pin;
>> +/// # #[pin_data]
>> +/// # struct Foo {
>> +/// # a: usize,
>> +/// # b: Bar,
>> +/// # }
>> +/// # #[pin_data]
>> +/// # struct Bar {
>> +/// # x: u32,
>> +/// # }
>> +///
>> +/// impl Foo {
>> +/// fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> {
>
> I would remove the empty line above `impl Foo` so that the example
> doesn't start with an empty line when rendered.

Sure.

>
>> +/// # Syntax
>> +///
>> +/// As already mentioned in the examples above, inside of `pin_init!` a `struct` initializer with
>> +/// the following modifications is expected:
>> +/// - Fields that you want to initialize in-place have to use `<-` instead of `:`.
>> +/// - In front of the initializer you can write `&this in` to have access to a [`NonNull<Self>`]
>> +/// pointer named `this` inside of the initializer.
>> +///
>> +/// For instance:
>> +///
>> +/// ```rust
>> +/// # use kernel::pin_init;
>> +/// # use macros::pin_data;
>> +/// # use core::{ptr::addr_of_mut, marker::PhantomPinned};
>> +/// #[pin_data]
>> +/// struct Buf {
>> +/// ptr: *mut u8,
>
> I'd add a comment on the `ptr` field saying "points at `buf`".

Sure.

>
>> +/// impl BigBuf {
>> +/// fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
>> +/// try_pin_init!(Self {
>> +/// big: {
>> +/// let zero = Box::try_new_zeroed()?;
>> +/// unsafe { zero.assume_init() }
>> +/// },
>
> Is there a reason for not using `Box::init(kernel::init::zeroed())?` here?

No, this was probably designed prior to `zeroed`, will change it.

--
Cheers,
Benno