Re: [PATCH v14 03/10] drm/display: Add Type-C switch helpers

From: Pin-yen Lin
Date: Thu Mar 30 2023 - 22:36:58 EST


Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:01 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 06:46:32PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> > Add helpers to register and unregister Type-C "switches" for bridges
> > capable of switching their output between two downstream devices.
> >
> > The helper registers USB Type-C mode switches when the "mode-switch"
> > and the "reg" properties are available in Device Tree.
>
> ...
>
> > +config DRM_DISPLAY_DP_TYPEC_HELPER
>
> > + bool
> > + default y
>
> def_bool y
>
> > + depends on DRM_DISPLAY_HELPER
> > + depends on DRM_DISPLAY_HELPER=TYPEC || TYPEC=y
> > + help
> > + DRM display helpers for USB Type-C Displayport Alternate mode.
>
> Hmm... Dunno if this help is enough.

Okay I'll add more detail in the next version.
>
> ...
>
> > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%pfwP-%u", fwnode, port_num);
>
> Would it be possible to have a dup in name and would it be a problem if so?
>
The port_num is included in the name, so the names should be unique.
Also, the fwnode name actually contains the reg property, so this name
looks like "endpoint@0-1" now... I'll change the name from fwnode name
to dev_name() per Dmitry's comment.
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * drm_dp_register_typec_switches() - register Type-C switches
> > + * @dev: Device that registers Type-C switches
> > + * @port: Device node for the switch
> > + * @switch_desc: A Type-C switch descriptor
> > + * @data: Private data for the switches
> > + * @mux_set: Callback function for typec_mux_set
> > + *
> > + * This function registers USB Type-C switches for DP bridges that can switch
> > + * the output signal between their output pins. This function uses devm_kcalloc
> > + * to allocate memory, so it is expected to only call this in the driver probe
> > + * functions.
> > + *
> > + * Currently only mode switches are implemented, and the function assumes the
> > + * given @port device node has endpoints with "mode-switch" property.
> > + * The port number is determined by the "reg" property of the endpoint.
>
> `kernel-doc -v ...` should complain on absence of "Return" section.
>
> > + */
>
> ...
>
> > + switch_desc->typec_ports = devm_kcalloc(dev, switch_desc->num_typec_switches,
> > + sizeof(struct drm_dp_typec_port_data),
>
> sizeof(*switch_desc_typec_ports),
>
> ?
>
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!switch_desc->typec_ports)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_DISPLAY_DP_TYPEC_HELPER
>
> Ah, maybe this should use IS_REACHABLE() ?

CONFIG_DRM_DISPLAY_DP_TYPEC_HELPER is a boolean. Is there any
difference between IS_REACHABLE and ifdef when the given config is a
boolean?
>
> > +void drm_dp_unregister_typec_switches(struct drm_dp_typec_switch_desc *switch_desc);
> > +int drm_dp_register_typec_switches(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *port,
> > + struct drm_dp_typec_switch_desc *switch_desc,
> > + void *data, typec_mux_set_fn_t mux_set);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void drm_dp_unregister_typec_switches(struct drm_dp_typec_switch_desc *switch_desc)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +static inline int drm_dp_register_typec_switches(
> > + struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *port,
> > + struct drm_dp_typec_switch_desc *switch_desc, void *data,
> > + typec_mux_set_fn_t mux_set)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>

Best regards,
Pin-yen
>