On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 10:55:40 -0700
isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Does this have to be a new generic ioctl with a dedicated new x86_ops? SNP
does not use it at all and all the system-scoped ioctl of SNP going through
the CCP driver. So getting system-scope information of TDX/SNP will end up
differently.
Any thought, Sean? Moving getting SNP system-wide information to
KVM dev ioctl seems not ideal and TDX does not have a dedicated driver like
CCP. Maybe make this ioctl TDX-specific? KVM_TDX_DEV_OP?