Re: [PATCH SPI for-next] spi: microchip: pci1xxxx: Fix minor bugs in spi-pci1xxxx driver

From: Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi
Date: Fri Mar 31 2023 - 04:59:37 EST


Hi Mark,

Thanks for the comments. Please find my inline replies below:

> As covered in submitting-patches.rst you should send one patch per
> change, this makes things much easier to review.

Okay. I will submit these fixes as a new patchset.

> I am unclear how chip select will ever be asserted with this change?
> Now the value is only written if we are disabling.

In PCI1xxxx, there is a common bit in hardware to enable / disable chip
select lines. I will use this bit in pci1xxxx_spi_set_cs API in
the upcoming version of patch. Currently, this bit is used within
pci1xxxx_spi_transfer_one API.


Thanks,
Tharun Kumar P
--- Begin Message --- On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:12:12AM +0530, Tharun Kumar P wrote:
> Following bugs are fixed in this patch:
> 1. pci1xxxx_spi_resume API masks SPI interrupt bit which prohibits
> firing of interrupt to the host at the end of the transaction after
> suspend-resume. This patch unmasks this bit at resume.
> 2. In pci1xxxx_spi_transfer_one API, length of SPI transaction gets
> cleared by unmasking length field. Set length of transaction after
> unmasking length field.
> 3. Remove support for disabling chip select as hardware does not support
> the same.

As covered in submitting-patches.rst you should send one patch per
change, this makes things much easier to review.

> drivers/spi/spi-pci1xxxx.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

The subject says this is a patch for the microchip driver...

> /* Set the DEV_SEL bits of the SPI_MST_CTL_REG */
> regval = readl(par->reg_base + SPI_MST_CTL_REG_OFFSET(p->hw_inst));
> - if (enable) {
> + if (!enable) {
> regval &= ~SPI_MST_CTL_DEVSEL_MASK;
> regval |= (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) << 25);
> writel(regval,
> par->reg_base + SPI_MST_CTL_REG_OFFSET(p->hw_inst));
> - } else {
> - regval &= ~(spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) << 25);
> - writel(regval,
> - par->reg_base + SPI_MST_CTL_REG_OFFSET(p->hw_inst));
> -

I am unclear how chip select will ever be asserted with this change?
Now the value is only written if we are disabling.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---