[PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: assorted build fixes for nolibc-test in rare cases

[Willy Tarreau]

Hello Paul,

please find in this series two small build fixes. One of them concerns
two missing include files for building the test against other libc (at
least glibc) since we added the tests for integer types and ranges. The
second one removes a single occurrence of a variable definition inside
the init statement of a for loop that breaks with older compilers which
do not default to c99. They're still convenient to test the portability
of the lib itself and I continue to use them for this purpose.

I consider that there's no rush on this, since these issues only affect
developers adding test cases, who should normally rebase on top of your
dev branch. So it's fine if it goes there.

Thank you!
Willy

Willy Tarreau (2):
  tools/nolibc: tests: fix build on non-c99 compliant compilers
  tools/nolibc: fix build of the test case using glibc

 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.17.5