Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/04/2023 12:41, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Also, this does not solve my previous question still.
>>>
>>> Well, the clocks are not added for the a few platforms (which include
>>> SM8550). Same for 'ice' reg range.. So the only thing left is to
>>> enforce the qcom,ice property availability only for SM8550. I believe
>>> it solves the mutual exclusiveness of the "ice" reg range along with the
>>> clocks versus the qcom,ice property, by enforcing at compatible level.
>>
>> Ah, I think I understand. That would work except I don't understand why
>> enforcing qcom,qce only for specific, new SoCs. Assuming it is a correct
>> hardware representation, we want it for everyone, don't we?
> 
> Yes, but they will be added to the subschema (qcom,ice one) when their
> their ICE support (ICE DT) will be added. This way, we keep the bindings
> check without failures (for now).

I understand that then you will rework this if:then case, so I think it
is just easier to make it correct from the first place. If there is
qcom,qce, then reg is maxItems:1. Otherwise - maxItems can be 2. You
achieve the same result, all DTS validate, without any need of further
changes later.


Best regards,
Krzysztof