Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v10] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas2781 driver

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:

> It makes sense, as array access reads 8 bit value, you would need to access
> value using pointer instead. So instead of doing be32_to_cpu(test_buf[i])
> you would need to do be32_to_cpu(*(test_buf + i)) if I didn't mess the
> pointer magic ;)

> And then I'm not sure which is better, be32_to_cpup or be32_to_cpu.

The p variant works with unaligned pointers but might be slower if the
architecture doesn't support unaligned access.  For this application it
probably doesn't matter either way.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature