Re: [PATCH net-next v3 13/13] sfc: register the vDPA device

[Gautam Dawar]

Pls ignore this patch. It seems to be a stale patch (may be from v1 or v2).

Let me know if it is required to re-send the series without this patch 
and call it v4.


Regards,

Gautam

On 4/6/23 12:26, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> Register the vDPA device which results in adding the device
> to the vDPA bus which will be probed by either of the vDPA
> bus drivers: virtio_vdpa or vhost_vdpa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautam Dawar <gautam.dawar@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_vdpa.c | 12 +++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_vdpa.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_vdpa.c
> index 50c062b417aa..a6bf43d98939 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_vdpa.c
> @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void ef100_vdpa_delete(struct efx_nic *efx)
>   			}
>   		}
>   
> -		/* replace with _vdpa_unregister_device later */
> -		put_device(&vdpa_dev->dev);
> +		_vdpa_unregister_device(&efx->vdpa_nic->vdpa_dev);
>   	}
>   	efx_mcdi_free_vis(efx);
>   }
> @@ -375,7 +374,14 @@ static struct ef100_vdpa_nic *ef100_vdpa_create(struct efx_nic *efx,
>   	if (rc)
>   		goto err_put_device;
>   
> -	/* _vdpa_register_device when its ready */
> +	rc = _vdpa_register_device(&vdpa_nic->vdpa_dev,
> +				   (allocated_vis - 1) * 2);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
> +			"vDPA device registration failed, vf: %u, rc: %d\n",
> +			nic_data->vf_index, rc);
> +		goto err_put_device;
> +	}
>   
>   	return vdpa_nic;
>