Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] sched/fair: Add util_guest for tasks

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Apr 06 2023 - 03:33:50 EST


On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 03:54:08PM -0700, David Dai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 1:14 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Appreciate your time,
>
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 03:43:36PM -0700, David Dai wrote:
> > > @@ -499,6 +509,7 @@ struct sched_avg {
> > > unsigned long load_avg;
> > > unsigned long runnable_avg;
> > > unsigned long util_avg;
> > > + unsigned long util_guest;
> > > struct util_est util_est;
> > > } ____cacheline_aligned;
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, no... you'll have to make room first.
> >
>
> I’m not sure what you mean. Do you mean making room by reducing
> another member in the same struct? If so, which member would be a good
> fit to shorten? Or do you mean something else entirely?

Yeah, as you can see below, this structure is completely filling up the
cacheline already so there's no room for another member. I've not looked
at this in detail in a little while so I'm not at all sure what would be
the easiest way to free up space.

Going by the rest of the discusion is seems this is the least of your
problems though.

> > struct sched_avg {
> > /* typedef u64 -> __u64 */ long long unsigned int last_update_time; /* 0 8 */
> > /* typedef u64 -> __u64 */ long long unsigned int load_sum; /* 8 8 */
> > /* typedef u64 -> __u64 */ long long unsigned int runnable_sum; /* 16 8 */
> > /* typedef u32 -> __u32 */ unsigned int util_sum; /* 24 4 */
> > /* typedef u32 -> __u32 */ unsigned int period_contrib; /* 28 4 */
> > long unsigned int load_avg; /* 32 8 */
> > long unsigned int runnable_avg; /* 40 8 */
> > long unsigned int util_avg; /* 48 8 */
> > struct util_est {
> > unsigned int enqueued; /* 56 4 */
> > unsigned int ewma; /* 60 4 */
> > } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)))util_est __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 56 8 */
> >
> > /* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */
> > /* forced alignments: 1 */
> > } __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));
> >
> >