Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG RAM slice through phandle

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05/04/2023 15:49, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5.04.2023 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 07:22:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 12:48:34 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> Due to the wild nature of the Qualcomm RPM Message RAM, we can't really
>>>> use 'reg' to point to the MPM's slice of Message RAM without cutting into
>>>> an already-defined RPM MSG RAM node used for GLINK and SMEM.
>>>>
>>>> Document passing the register space as a slice of SRAM through the
>>>> qcom,rpm-msg-ram property. This also makes 'reg' deprecated.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml   | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.example.dts:22.35-38.11: Warning (node_name_vs_property_name): /example-0/interrupt-controller: node name and property name conflict
>>
>> Looks like this is colliding with the example template which has to 
>> craft an interrupt provider for 'interrupts' properties. Either adding a 
>> parent node or using interrupts-extended instead should work-around it.
> Check the devicetree-org issue linked in the cover letter, please!
> 
> I suppose wrapping it in a parent node could work as a temporary
> measure, but since it belongs outside /soc, I'd have to make up
> a bogus simple-bus, I think.

I don't think your issue in dtschema is accurate. As Rob suggested, you
need wrapping node.

Best regards,
Krzysztof