Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] extcon: Drop unneeded assignments

[Chanwoo Choi]

On 23. 4. 6. 00:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In one case the assignment is duplicative, in the other,
> it's better to move it into the loop — the user of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 50c5fd454488..88ce0656d23c 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(extcon_dev_list_lock);
>  
>  static int check_mutually_exclusive(struct extcon_dev *edev, u32 new_state)
>  {
> -	int i = 0;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (!edev->mutually_exclusive)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static int extcon_alloc_groups(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>   */
>  int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	int ret, index = 0;
> +	int ret, index;
>  
>  	ret = create_extcon_class();
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  	if (!edev || !edev->supported_cable)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	for (; edev->supported_cable[index] != EXTCON_NONE; index++);
> +	for (index = 0; edev->supported_cable[index] != EXTCON_NONE; index++);
>  
>  	edev->max_supported = index;
>  	if (index > SUPPORTED_CABLE_MAX) {


On previous version, I already replied the my ack.
But this version doesn't contain my ack tag.

So that 
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> again.

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi