Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 as a scattered flag

[Sean Christopherson]

This shortlog is flat out wrong.  This patch does not add X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2,
it adds a KVM-only leaf to redirect X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 to its architectural
location when KVM queries the leaf, e.g. via guest_cpuid_has().

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Considering that the core kernel may also want to know this flag, to avoid

Please write changelogs so that they do not depend on the shortlog for context.
I know the tip maintainers in particular like to make the changelog a continuation
of the shortlog, but I find it really annoying, especially when reviewing in mutt,
e.g. as I'm typing this, I don't even have the shortlog visible.

In the vast majority of cases, being more explicit rarely adds more than a few
chars, e.g. you'll save more by reducing the fluff in this changelog.

> confusion this needs to be a scattered flag rather than a pure KVM flag so
> that KVM can redirect it to the hardware-defined bit position, which is the
> role of __feature_translate() and KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2.

Like the shortlog, the changelog is best misleading, X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 is
already a scattered flag.

  Define a KVM-only leaf for AMD's PerfMonV2 feature flag to redirect the
  kernel's scattered version to its architectural location, e.g. so that
  KVM can query guest support via guest_cpuid_has().