Re: [PATCH] RDMA/hfi: add a judgment on the availability of cpumask

From: kernel test robot
Date: Fri Apr 07 2023 - 00:07:36 EST

Next message: Peng Zhang: "[PATCH 2/2] maple_tree: Fix a potential memory leak, OOB access, or other unpredictable bug"
Previous message: Xingui Yang: "[PATCH] scsi: libsas: set tf to normal in sas_ata_device_link_abort()"
In reply to: Leon Romanovsky: "Re: [PATCH] RDMA/hfi: add a judgment on the availability of cpumask"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi xiaolinkui,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on rdma/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.3-rc5 next-20230406]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/xiaolinkui/RDMA-hfi-add-a-judgment-on-the-availability-of-cpumask/20230404-113847
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404030525.24020-1-xiaolinkui%40126.com
patch subject: [PATCH] RDMA/hfi: add a judgment on the availability of cpumask
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003-20220117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230407/202304071125.xK1fezQ1-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/206c6fc9aa5afd354f4201216ca8c2c0057fb49d
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review xiaolinkui/RDMA-hfi-add-a-judgment-on-the-availability-of-cpumask/20230404-113847
git checkout 206c6fc9aa5afd354f4201216ca8c2c0057fb49d
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304071125.xK1fezQ1-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:5,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:87,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
from include/linux/percpu.h:5,
from include/linux/arch_topology.h:9,
from include/linux/topology.h:30,
from drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c:6:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c: In function 'hfi1_get_proc_affinity':
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c:1050:30: warning: the address of 'diff' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress]
1050 | if (!ret || unlikely(!diff))
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c:1053:30: warning: the address of 'hw_thread_mask' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress]
1053 | if (!ret || unlikely(!hw_thread_mask))
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c:1056:30: warning: the address of 'available_mask' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress]
1056 | if (!ret || unlikely(!available_mask))
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c:1059:30: warning: the address of 'intrs_mask' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress]
1059 | if (!ret || unlikely(!intrs_mask))
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^

vim +1050 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/affinity.c

995
996 int hfi1_get_proc_affinity(int node)
997 {
998 int cpu = -1, ret, i;
999 struct hfi1_affinity_node *entry;
1000 cpumask_var_t diff, hw_thread_mask, available_mask, intrs_mask;
1001 const struct cpumask *node_mask,
1002 *proc_mask = current->cpus_ptr;
1003 struct hfi1_affinity_node_list *affinity = &node_affinity;
1004 struct cpu_mask_set *set = &affinity->proc;
1005
1006 /*
1007 * check whether process/context affinity has already
1008 * been set
1009 */
1010 if (current->nr_cpus_allowed == 1) {
1011 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "PID %u %s affinity set to CPU %*pbl",
1012 current->pid, current->comm,
1013 cpumask_pr_args(proc_mask));
1014 /*
1015 * Mark the pre-set CPU as used. This is atomic so we don't
1016 * need the lock
1017 */
1018 cpu = cpumask_first(proc_mask);
1019 cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &set->used);
1020 goto done;
1021 } else if (current->nr_cpus_allowed < cpumask_weight(&set->mask)) {
1022 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "PID %u %s affinity set to CPU set(s) %*pbl",
1023 current->pid, current->comm,
1024 cpumask_pr_args(proc_mask));
1025 goto done;
1026 }
1027
1028 /*
1029 * The process does not have a preset CPU affinity so find one to
1030 * recommend using the following algorithm:
1031 *
1032 * For each user process that is opening a context on HFI Y:
1033 * a) If all cores are filled, reinitialize the bitmask
1034 * b) Fill real cores first, then HT cores (First set of HT
1035 * cores on all physical cores, then second set of HT core,
1036 * and, so on) in the following order:
1037 *
1038 * 1. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and not running an IRQ
1039 * handler
1040 * 2. Same NUMA node as HFI Y and running an IRQ handler
1041 * 3. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and not running an IRQ
1042 * handler
1043 * 4. Different NUMA node to HFI Y and running an IRQ
1044 * handler
1045 * c) Mark core as filled in the bitmask. As user processes are
1046 * done, clear cores from the bitmask.
1047 */
1048
1049 ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&diff, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1050 if (!ret || unlikely(!diff))
1051 goto done;
1052 ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&hw_thread_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1053 if (!ret || unlikely(!hw_thread_mask))
1054 goto free_diff;
1055 ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&available_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1056 if (!ret || unlikely(!available_mask))
1057 goto free_hw_thread_mask;
1058 ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&intrs_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1059 if (!ret || unlikely(!intrs_mask))
1060 goto free_available_mask;
1061
1062 mutex_lock(&affinity->lock);
1063 /*
1064 * If we've used all available HW threads, clear the mask and start
1065 * overloading.
1066 */
1067 _cpu_mask_set_gen_inc(set);
1068
1069 /*
1070 * If NUMA node has CPUs used by interrupt handlers, include them in the
1071 * interrupt handler mask.
1072 */
1073 entry = node_affinity_lookup(node);
1074 if (entry) {
1075 cpumask_copy(intrs_mask, (entry->def_intr.gen ?
1076 &entry->def_intr.mask :
1077 &entry->def_intr.used));
1078 cpumask_or(intrs_mask, intrs_mask, (entry->rcv_intr.gen ?
1079 &entry->rcv_intr.mask :
1080 &entry->rcv_intr.used));
1081 cpumask_or(intrs_mask, intrs_mask, &entry->general_intr_mask);
1082 }
1083 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "CPUs used by interrupts: %*pbl",
1084 cpumask_pr_args(intrs_mask));
1085
1086 cpumask_copy(hw_thread_mask, &set->mask);
1087
1088 /*
1089 * If HT cores are enabled, identify which HW threads within the
1090 * physical cores should be used.
1091 */
1092 if (affinity->num_core_siblings > 0) {
1093 for (i = 0; i < affinity->num_core_siblings; i++) {
1094 find_hw_thread_mask(i, hw_thread_mask, affinity);
1095
1096 /*
1097 * If there's at least one available core for this HW
1098 * thread number, stop looking for a core.
1099 *
1100 * diff will always be not empty at least once in this
1101 * loop as the used mask gets reset when
1102 * (set->mask == set->used) before this loop.
1103 */
1104 cpumask_andnot(diff, hw_thread_mask, &set->used);
1105 if (!cpumask_empty(diff))
1106 break;
1107 }
1108 }
1109 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "Same available HW thread on all physical CPUs: %*pbl",
1110 cpumask_pr_args(hw_thread_mask));
1111
1112 node_mask = cpumask_of_node(node);
1113 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "Device on NUMA %u, CPUs %*pbl", node,
1114 cpumask_pr_args(node_mask));
1115
1116 /* Get cpumask of available CPUs on preferred NUMA */
1117 cpumask_and(available_mask, hw_thread_mask, node_mask);
1118 cpumask_andnot(available_mask, available_mask, &set->used);
1119 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "Available CPUs on NUMA %u: %*pbl", node,
1120 cpumask_pr_args(available_mask));
1121
1122 /*
1123 * At first, we don't want to place processes on the same
1124 * CPUs as interrupt handlers. Then, CPUs running interrupt
1125 * handlers are used.
1126 *
1127 * 1) If diff is not empty, then there are CPUs not running
1128 * non-interrupt handlers available, so diff gets copied
1129 * over to available_mask.
1130 * 2) If diff is empty, then all CPUs not running interrupt
1131 * handlers are taken, so available_mask contains all
1132 * available CPUs running interrupt handlers.
1133 * 3) If available_mask is empty, then all CPUs on the
1134 * preferred NUMA node are taken, so other NUMA nodes are
1135 * used for process assignments using the same method as
1136 * the preferred NUMA node.
1137 */
1138 cpumask_andnot(diff, available_mask, intrs_mask);
1139 if (!cpumask_empty(diff))
1140 cpumask_copy(available_mask, diff);
1141
1142 /* If we don't have CPUs on the preferred node, use other NUMA nodes */
1143 if (cpumask_empty(available_mask)) {
1144 cpumask_andnot(available_mask, hw_thread_mask, &set->used);
1145 /* Excluding preferred NUMA cores */
1146 cpumask_andnot(available_mask, available_mask, node_mask);
1147 hfi1_cdbg(PROC,
1148 "Preferred NUMA node cores are taken, cores available in other NUMA nodes: %*pbl",
1149 cpumask_pr_args(available_mask));
1150
1151 /*
1152 * At first, we don't want to place processes on the same
1153 * CPUs as interrupt handlers.
1154 */
1155 cpumask_andnot(diff, available_mask, intrs_mask);
1156 if (!cpumask_empty(diff))
1157 cpumask_copy(available_mask, diff);
1158 }
1159 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "Possible CPUs for process: %*pbl",
1160 cpumask_pr_args(available_mask));
1161
1162 cpu = cpumask_first(available_mask);
1163 if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) /* empty */
1164 cpu = -1;
1165 else
1166 cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &set->used);
1167
1168 mutex_unlock(&affinity->lock);
1169 hfi1_cdbg(PROC, "Process assigned to CPU %d", cpu);
1170
1171 free_cpumask_var(intrs_mask);
1172 free_available_mask:
1173 free_cpumask_var(available_mask);
1174 free_hw_thread_mask:
1175 free_cpumask_var(hw_thread_mask);
1176 free_diff:
1177 free_cpumask_var(diff);
1178 done:
1179 return cpu;
1180 }
1181

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests

Next message: Peng Zhang: "[PATCH 2/2] maple_tree: Fix a potential memory leak, OOB access, or other unpredictable bug"
Previous message: Xingui Yang: "[PATCH] scsi: libsas: set tf to normal in sas_ata_device_link_abort()"
In reply to: Leon Romanovsky: "Re: [PATCH] RDMA/hfi: add a judgment on the availability of cpumask"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]