Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs
From: Matti Vaittinen
Date: Mon Apr 10 2023 - 06:16:40 EST
la 8. huhtik. 2023 klo 12.34 Jonathan Cameron (jic23@xxxxxxxxxx) kirjoitti:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:24:15 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > IIO has very nice facilities for efficiently providing data from a
> > device to user (and probably also vice-versa - but I've not used that
> > direction). Getting started with IIO may not be so simple though - some
> > of the concepts like triggers and buffers are quite unique.
> >
> > This series tries to make it easier for a newcomer to write his/her first
> > IIO driver by adding some documentation to used enums. Series does not
> > provide extensive documentation but just documents those few entries I
> > have become familiar with - but it still aims to be a starting point for
> > others to add missing bits and pieces.
> >
> > This series is marked as v2 because the patch 1 was previously sent as a
> > stan-alone RFC to collect the missing channel units. RFC can be seen
> > here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/10a855f9adc1d710150b7f647500c3c6a769f9ca.1677243698.git.mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Patches 2 and 3 were added as a result of discussion followed by the
> > RFC.
>
> Something odd happened on this resend. Patch 1 didn't make it to me
> or patchwork. I'll reply to previous posting instead.
>
It seems checkpatch.pl + some of the patches were only picking the
huawei.com address. Maybe that is the reason?
This really was a resend with no changes other than rebasing it -
hence reviewing the v2 was absolutely fine. Thanks for the review!
I'll check the suggestions and send v3 later this week.
Yours,
-- Matti