Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] rust: sync: introduce `LockedBy`

From: Boqun Feng
Date: Mon Apr 10 2023 - 13:48:02 EST


On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 04:53:40AM -0300, Wedson Almeida Filho wrote:
> From: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This allows us to have data protected by a lock despite not being
> wrapped by it. Access is granted by providing evidence that the lock is
> held by the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Added build_assert to rule out zero-sized types
> v2 -> v3: Improve comments around panics and support for ZSTs
>
> rust/kernel/sync.rs | 2 +
> rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs | 2 +-
> rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> index 431402180aa8..d219ee518eff 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> @@ -10,10 +10,12 @@ use crate::types::Opaque;
> mod arc;
> mod condvar;
> pub mod lock;
> +mod locked_by;
>
> pub use arc::{Arc, ArcBorrow, UniqueArc};
> pub use condvar::CondVar;
> pub use lock::{mutex::Mutex, spinlock::SpinLock};
> +pub use locked_by::LockedBy;
>
> /// Represents a lockdep class. It's a wrapper around C's `lock_class_key`.
> #[repr(transparent)]
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> index c365bc909dff..84d8d7d01aaa 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ pub struct Lock<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> {
> _pin: PhantomPinned,
>
> /// The data protected by the lock.
> - data: UnsafeCell<T>,
> + pub(crate) data: UnsafeCell<T>,
> }
>
> // SAFETY: `Lock` can be transferred across thread boundaries iff the data it protects can.
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ab0ecb013f54
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! A wrapper for data protected by a lock that does not wrap it.
> +
> +use super::{lock::Backend, lock::Lock};
> +use core::{cell::UnsafeCell, ptr};
> +
> +/// Allows access to some data to be serialised by a lock that does not wrap it.
> +///
> +/// In most cases, data protected by a lock is wrapped by the appropriate lock type, e.g.,
> +/// [`super::Mutex`] or [`super::SpinLock`]. [`LockedBy`] is meant for cases when this is not
> +/// possible. For example, if a container has a lock and some data in the contained elements needs
> +/// to be protected by the same lock.
> +///
> +/// [`LockedBy`] wraps the data in lieu of another locking primitive, and only allows access to it
> +/// when the caller shows evidence that the 'external' lock is locked. It panics if the evidence
> +/// refers to the wrong instance of the lock.
> +///
> +/// # Examples
> +///
> +/// The following is an example for illustrative purposes: `InnerDirectory::bytes_used` is an
> +/// aggregate of all `InnerFile::bytes_used` and must be kept consistent; so we wrap `InnerFile` in
> +/// a `LockedBy` so that it shares a lock with `InnerDirectory`. This allows us to enforce at
> +/// compile-time that access to `InnerFile` is only granted when an `InnerDirectory` is also
> +/// locked; we enforce at run time that the right `InnerDirectory` is locked.
> +///
> +/// ```
> +/// use kernel::sync::{LockedBy, Mutex};
> +///
> +/// struct InnerFile {
> +/// bytes_used: u64,
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// struct File {
> +/// _ino: u32,
> +/// inner: LockedBy<InnerFile, InnerDirectory>,
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// struct InnerDirectory {
> +/// /// The sum of the bytes used by all files.
> +/// bytes_used: u64,
> +/// _files: Vec<File>,
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// struct Directory {
> +/// _ino: u32,
> +/// inner: Mutex<InnerDirectory>,
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// /// Prints `bytes_used` from both the directory and file.
> +/// fn print_bytes_used(dir: &Directory, file: &File) {
> +/// let guard = dir.inner.lock();
> +/// let inner_file = file.inner.access(&guard);
> +/// pr_info!("{} {}", guard.bytes_used, inner_file.bytes_used);
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// /// Increments `bytes_used` for both the directory and file.
> +/// fn inc_bytes_used(dir: &Directory, file: &File) {
> +/// let mut guard = dir.inner.lock();
> +/// guard.bytes_used += 10;
> +///
> +/// let file_inner = file.inner.access_mut(&mut guard);
> +/// file_inner.bytes_used += 10;
> +/// }
> +///
> +/// /// Creates a new file.
> +/// fn new_file(ino: u32, dir: &Directory) -> File {
> +/// File {
> +/// _ino: ino,
> +/// inner: LockedBy::new(&dir.inner, InnerFile { bytes_used: 0 }),
> +/// }
> +/// }
> +/// ```
> +pub struct LockedBy<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized> {
> + owner: *const U,
> + data: UnsafeCell<T>,
> +}
> +
> +// SAFETY: `LockedBy` can be transferred across thread boundaries iff the data it protects can.
> +unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send, U: ?Sized> Send for LockedBy<T, U> {}
> +
> +// SAFETY: `LockedBy` serialises the interior mutability it provides, so it is `Sync` as long as the
> +// data it protects is `Send`.
> +unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send, U: ?Sized> Sync for LockedBy<T, U> {}
> +
> +impl<T, U: ?Sized> LockedBy<T, U> {
> + /// Constructs a new instance of [`LockedBy`].
> + ///
> + /// It stores a raw pointer to the owner that is never dereferenced. It is only used to ensure
> + /// that the right owner is being used to access the protected data. If the owner is freed, the
> + /// data becomes inaccessible; if another instance of the owner is allocated *on the same
> + /// memory location*, the data becomes accessible again: none of this affects memory safety
> + /// because in any case at most one thread (or CPU) can access the protected data at a time.
> + pub fn new(owner: &Lock<U, impl Backend>, data: T) -> Self {
> + Self {
> + owner: owner.data.get(),

Given we use the address of the `data` as a key to verify holding a
lock, I think we should use `Pin<_>` in the function signature, i.e.

pub fn new(owner: Pin<&Lock<U, impl Backend>, data: T) -> Self {
Self {
owner: owner.get_ref().data.get()
data: UnsafeCell::new(data),
}
}

Thoughts?

Regards,
Boqun

> + data: UnsafeCell::new(data),
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl<T: ?Sized, U> LockedBy<T, U> {
> + /// Returns a reference to the protected data when the caller provides evidence (via a
> + /// reference) that the owner is locked.
> + ///
> + /// `U` cannot be a zero-sized type (ZST) because there are ways to get an `&U` that matches
> + /// the data protected by the lock without actually holding it.
> + ///
> + /// # Panics
> + ///
> + /// Panics if `owner` is different from the data protected by the lock used in
> + /// [`new`](LockedBy::new).
> + pub fn access<'a>(&'a self, owner: &'a U) -> &'a T {
> + // Detect the usage of SZTs, which are supported, at compile time.
> + crate::build_assert!(core::mem::size_of::<U>() > 0);
> + if !ptr::eq(owner, self.owner) {
> + panic!("mismatched owners");
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: `owner` is evidence that the owner is locked.
> + unsafe { &*self.data.get() }
> + }
> +
> + /// Returns a mutable reference to the protected data when the caller provides evidence (via a
> + /// mutable owner) that the owner is locked mutably.
> + ///
> + /// `U` cannot be a zero-sized type (ZST) because there are ways to get an `&mut U` that
> + /// matches the data protected by the lock without actually holding it.
> + ///
> + /// Showing a mutable reference to the owner is sufficient because we know no other references
> + /// can exist to it.
> + ///
> + /// # Panics
> + ///
> + /// Panics if `owner` is different from the data protected by the lock used in
> + /// [`new`](LockedBy::new).
> + pub fn access_mut<'a>(&'a self, owner: &'a mut U) -> &'a mut T {
> + // Detect the usage of SZTs, which are supported, at compile time.
> + crate::build_assert!(core::mem::size_of::<U>() > 0);
> + if !ptr::eq(owner, self.owner) {
> + panic!("mismatched owners");
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: `owner` is evidence that there is only one reference to the owner.
> + unsafe { &mut *self.data.get() }
> + }
> +}
> --
> 2.34.1
>