Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cisco: document the CrayAR compatibles

From: Daniel Walker (danielwa)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2023 - 13:51:24 EST


On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM +0000, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:28:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 07/04/2023 18:04, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > >>
> > >> Dual license.
> > >>
> > >
> > > What are my choices here? I see this,
> > >
> > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >
> > Yes, the one suggested by the checkpatch. Did you run it?
>
> I don't recall if I did or not.
>
> > >
> > > Which appears to be what your suggesting. I also see this,
> > >
> > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > >
> > > I'd rather use the later.
> >
> > Why? Bindings should be licensed under BSD, so what is the reason to
> > make here exception?
>
> I'm sure I can re-license my submissions. I'd have to look into it.

I'm _not_ sure.