Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 18:15:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After merging the mediatek tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
> defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.o: in function `mtk_mmsys_update_bits':
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:147: undefined reference to `cmdq_pkt_write_mask'
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.o: in function `mtk_mmsys_probe':
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:386: undefined reference to `cmdq_dev_get_client_reg'
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.o: in function `mtk_mutex_enable_by_cmdq':
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c:883: undefined reference to `cmdq_pkt_write'
> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.o: in function `mtk_mutex_probe':
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c:1023: undefined reference to `cmdq_dev_get_client_reg'
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   b34884b4c878 ("soc: mediatek: Cleanup ifdefs for IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)")
> 
> I have used the mediatek tree from next-20230331 for today.
> 
> There were also the following warnings:
> 
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:104.21-109.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc/i2c@11010000/accelerometer@0x10: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:111.20-114.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc/i2c@11010000/magnetometer@0x12: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:104.21-109.4: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /soc/i2c@11010000/accelerometer@0x10: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "10"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:111.20-114.4: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /soc/i2c@11010000/magnetometer@0x12: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "12"

Ping?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpgwGHz_XZQ7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature