On 8.04.2023 15:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
The GCC clock controller needs CX power domain, at least according to+CC Rajendra (author of 5d6fc6321db1 ("arm64: dts: qcom:
DTS:
sc7180-trogdor-pompom-r3.dtb: clock-controller@100000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('power-domains' was unexpected)
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
sc7180: Add required-opps for USB"))
Rajendra, shouldn't SC7180 GCC have PM ops to make sure a vote
is only there when AP is active?
Are all GDSCs powered by CX?
If not, wouldn't this also need power-domain-names to
facilitate e.g. potential MX-powered ones?
Konrad
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml
index 06dce0c6b7d0..8bf9b6f49550 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ properties:
- const: bi_tcxo_ao
- const: sleep_clk
+ power-domains:
+ items:
+ - description: CX domain
+
required:
- compatible
- clocks
@@ -45,6 +49,8 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
examples:
- |
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
+
clock-controller@100000 {
compatible = "qcom,gcc-sc7180";
reg = <0x00100000 0x1f0000>;
@@ -52,6 +58,7 @@ examples:
<&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
<&sleep_clk>;
clock-names = "bi_tcxo", "bi_tcxo_ao", "sleep_clk";
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
#power-domain-cells = <1>;