Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base qrb4210-rb2 board dts

[Bhupesh Sharma]

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 18:26, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11.04.2023 09:28, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Add DTS for Qualcomm qrb4210-rb2 board which uses SM4250 SoC.
> >
> > This adds debug uart, emmc, uSD and tlmm support along with
> > regulators found on this board.
> >
> > Also defines the 'xo_board' and 'sleep_clk' frequencies for
> > this board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile        |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> > index e0e2def48470..d42c59572ace 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)     += qcs404-evb-1000.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qcs404-evb-4000.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qdu1000-idp.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qrb2210-rb1.dtb
> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qrb4210-rb2.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qrb5165-rb5.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qrb5165-rb5-vision-mezzanine.dtb
> >  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)      += qru1000-idp.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c9c6e3787462
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "sm4250.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > +     model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QRB4210 RB2";
> > +     compatible = "qcom,qrb4210-rb2", "qcom,qrb4210", "qcom,sm4250";
> > +
> > +     aliases {
> > +             serial0 = &uart4;
> > +     };
> > +
> > +     chosen {
> > +             stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> > +     };
> > +
> > +     vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator {
> > +             compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > +             regulator-name = "vph_pwr";
> > +             regulator-min-microvolt = <3700000>;
> > +             regulator-max-microvolt = <3700000>;
> > +
> > +             regulator-always-on;
> > +             regulator-boot-on;
> > +     };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&qupv3_id_0 {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&rpm_requests {
> > +     regulators {
> > +             compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm6125-regulators";
> > +
> > +             vdd-s1-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s2-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s3-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s4-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s5-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s6-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s7-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s8-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s9-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-s10-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +
> > +             vdd-l1-l7-l17-l18-supply = <&vreg_s6a_1p352>;
> > +             vdd-l2-l3-l4-supply = <&vreg_s6a_1p352>;
> > +             vdd-l5-l15-l19-l20-l21-l22-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +             vdd-l6-l8-supply = <&vreg_s5a_0p848>;
> > +             vdd-l9-l11-supply = <&vreg_s7a_2p04>;
> > +             vdd-l10-l13-l14-supply = <&vreg_s7a_2p04>;
> > +             vdd-l12-l16-supply = <&vreg_s7a_2p04>;
> > +             vdd-l23-l24-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
> > +
> > +             vreg_s5a_0p848: s5 {
> I think going with pmicname_regulatorname (e.g. pm6125_s5) here
> and adding:
>
> regulator-name = "vreg_s5a_0p848"
>
> would make this more maintainable.

Ok.

> > +&sdhc_1 {
> > +     vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l24a_2p96>;
> > +     vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l11a_1p8>;
> > +     no-sdio;
> > +     non-removable;
> > +
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&sdhc_2 {
> > +     cd-gpios = <&tlmm 88 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* card detect gpio */
> This comment is still pretty much spam.

Ok.

> > +     vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l22a_2p96>;
> > +     vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l5a_2p96>;
> > +     no-sdio;
> > +
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&sleep_clk {
> > +     clock-frequency = <32000>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&tlmm {
> > +     gpio-reserved-ranges = <37 5>, <43 2>, <47 1>,
> > +                            <49 1>, <52 1>, <54 1>,
> > +                            <56 3>, <61 2>, <64 1>,
> > +                            <68 1>, <72 8>, <96 1>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&uart4 {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> This is not the correct SE for the production board. People
> booting this will get a tz bite.

Hmm.. I can swap it, but the problem is that it's as the SE for my RB2
board, so I would rather provide instructions in the cover letter as to how
to swap it (say for a production board) and recompile the dts.

Otherwise, it might break the debug uart console for even the test
folks @ Qualcomm.
I will send a v4 accordingly.

Thanks,
Bhupesh