Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: add DSC range checking during resource reservation
From: Marijn Suijten
Date: Tue Apr 11 2023 - 18:24:14 EST
Again, don't forget to include previous reviewers in cc, please :)
On 2023-04-11 14:09:40, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> Perform DSC range checking to make sure correct DSC is requested before
> reserve resource for it.
This isn't performing any range checking for resource reservations /
requests: this is only validating the constants written in our catalog
and seems rather useless. It isn't fixing any real bug either, so the
Fixes: tag below seems extraneous.
Given prior comments from Abhinav that "the kernel should be trusted",
we should remove this validation for all the other blocks instead.
> Fixes: c985d7bb64ff ("drm/msm/disp/dpu1: Add DSC support in RM")
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> index f4dda88..95e58f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "[drm:%s] " fmt, __func__
> @@ -250,6 +251,11 @@ int dpu_rm_init(struct dpu_rm *rm,
> struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw;
> const struct dpu_dsc_cfg *dsc = &cat->dsc[i];
>
> + if (dsc->id < DSC_0 || dsc->id >= DSC_MAX) {
> + DPU_ERROR("skip dsc %d with invalid id\n", dsc->id);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> hw = dpu_hw_dsc_init(dsc->id, mmio, cat);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw)) {
> rc = PTR_ERR(hw);
> @@ -557,8 +563,10 @@ static int _dpu_rm_make_reservation(
> }
>
> ret = _dpu_rm_reserve_dsc(rm, global_state, enc, &reqs->topology);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + DPU_ERROR("unable to find appropriate DSC\n");
This, while a nice addition, should go in a different patch.
Thanks!
- Marijn
> return ret;
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>