Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Add support for MT6795 Helio X10

From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Wed Apr 12 2023 - 08:56:02 EST



On 30/03/2023 01:07, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
" or

Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 10:42, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Add the necessary bits to support the MT6795 Helio X10 smartphone SoC:
this is always paired with a MT6331 PMIC, with MT6332 companion.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index ceeac43f7bd1..20d32328382a 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -639,6 +639,91 @@ static int mt6779_regs[] = {
[PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xC28,
};

+static int mt6795_regs[] = {
+ [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0,
+ [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,
+ [PWRAP_DIO_EN] = 0x8,
+ [PWRAP_SIDLY] = 0xc,
+ [PWRAP_RDDMY] = 0x10,
+ [PWRAP_SI_CK_CON] = 0x14,
+ [PWRAP_CSHEXT_WRITE] = 0x18,
+ [PWRAP_CSHEXT_READ] = 0x1c,
+ [PWRAP_CSLEXT_START] = 0x20,
+ [PWRAP_CSLEXT_END] = 0x24,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_PRD] = 0x28,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_GRPEN] = 0x2c,
+ [PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR] = 0x30,
+ [PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR] = 0x34,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_MAN_TRIG] = 0x40,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_STA] = 0x44,
+ [PWRAP_WRAP_STA] = 0x48,
+ [PWRAP_HARB_INIT] = 0x4c,
+ [PWRAP_HARB_HPRIO] = 0x50,
+ [PWRAP_HIPRIO_ARB_EN] = 0x54,
+ [PWRAP_HARB_STA0] = 0x58,
+ [PWRAP_HARB_STA1] = 0x5c,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_EN] = 0x60,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_CMD] = 0x64,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_RDATA] = 0x68,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_VLDCLR] = 0x6c,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_EN] = 0x70,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE0] = 0x74,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_CMD] = 0x78,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_RDATA] = 0x7c,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_VLDCLR] = 0x80,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_EN] = 0x84,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE1] = 0x88,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_CMD] = 0x8c,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_RDATA] = 0x90,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_VLDCLR] = 0x94,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_EN] = 0x98,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] = 0x9c,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] = 0xa0,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] = 0xa4,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xa8,
+ [PWRAP_INT_EN] = 0xac,
+ [PWRAP_INT_FLG_RAW] = 0xb0,
+ [PWRAP_INT_FLG] = 0xb4,
+ [PWRAP_INT_CLR] = 0xb8,
+ [PWRAP_SIG_ADR] = 0xbc,
+ [PWRAP_SIG_MODE] = 0xc0,
+ [PWRAP_SIG_VALUE] = 0xc4,
+ [PWRAP_SIG_ERRVAL] = 0xc8,
+ [PWRAP_CRC_EN] = 0xcc,
+ [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] = 0xd0,
+ [PWRAP_TIMER_STA] = 0xd4,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_UNIT] = 0xd8,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN] = 0xdc,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_FLG] = 0xe0,
+ [PWRAP_DEBUG_INT_SEL] = 0xe4,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR0] = 0xe8,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA0] = 0xec,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR1] = 0xf0,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA1] = 0xf4,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR2] = 0xf8,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA2] = 0xfc,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR3] = 0x100,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA3] = 0x104,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR4] = 0x108,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA4] = 0x10c,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR5] = 0x110,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA5] = 0x114,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR6] = 0x118,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA6] = 0x11c,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_ADR7] = 0x120,
+ [PWRAP_DVFS_WDATA7] = 0x124,
+ [PWRAP_SPMINF_STA] = 0x128,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_KEY_SEL] = 0x12c,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_IV_SEL] = 0x130,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_EN] = 0x134,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_RDY] = 0x138,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_MODE] = 0x13c,
+ [PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST] = 0x140,
+ [PWRAP_DCM_EN] = 0x144,
+ [PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD] = 0x148,
+ [PWRAP_EXT_CK] = 0x14c,
+};
+
static int mt6797_regs[] = {
[PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0,
[PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,
@@ -1230,6 +1315,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
PWRAP_MT2701,
PWRAP_MT6765,
PWRAP_MT6779,
+ PWRAP_MT6795,
PWRAP_MT6797,
PWRAP_MT6873,
PWRAP_MT7622,
@@ -1650,6 +1736,20 @@ static void pwrap_init_chip_select_ext(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u8 hext_write,
static int pwrap_common_init_reg_clock(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
{
switch (wrp->master->type) {
+ case PWRAP_MT6795:
+ if (wrp->slave->type == PMIC_MT6331) {
+ const u32 *dew_regs = wrp->slave->dew_regs;
+
+ pwrap_write(wrp, dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_RDDMY_NO], 0x8);
+
+ if (wrp->slave->comp_type == PMIC_MT6332) {
+ dew_regs = wrp->slave->comp_dew_regs;
+ pwrap_write(wrp, dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_RDDMY_NO], 0x8);
+ }
+ }
+ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x88, PWRAP_RDDMY);
+ pwrap_init_chip_select_ext(wrp, 15, 15, 15, 15);
+ break;
case PWRAP_MT8173:
pwrap_init_chip_select_ext(wrp, 0, 4, 2, 2);
break;
@@ -1744,6 +1844,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
case PWRAP_MT2701:
case PWRAP_MT6765:
case PWRAP_MT6779:
+ case PWRAP_MT6795:
case PWRAP_MT6797:
case PWRAP_MT8173:
case PWRAP_MT8186:
@@ -1914,6 +2015,19 @@ static int pwrap_mt2701_init_soc_specific(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
return 0;
}

+static int pwrap_mt6795_init_soc_specific(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
+{
+ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_STAUPD_GRPEN);
+
+ if (wrp->slave->type == PMIC_MT6331)
+ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1b4, PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR);
+
+ if (wrp->slave->comp_type == PMIC_MT6332)
+ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x8112, PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int pwrap_mt7622_init_soc_specific(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
{
pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_STAUPD_PRD);
@@ -1949,7 +2063,8 @@ static int pwrap_init(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
if (wrp->rstc_bridge)
reset_control_reset(wrp->rstc_bridge);

- if (wrp->master->type == PWRAP_MT8173) {
+ if (wrp->master->type == PWRAP_MT8173 ||
+ wrp->master->type == PWRAP_MT6795) {

I would prefer to put a switch case like it's done in
"pwrap_common_init_reg_clock" or
"pwrap_init_cipher".


I agree, a switch would be better here.

Regards,
Matthias

My second choice (which isn't aligned with the current
implementation), is to add boolean
capabilities in the "struct pmic_wrapper_type".

/* Enable DCM */
pwrap_writel(wrp, 3, PWRAP_DCM_EN);
pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD);
@@ -2185,6 +2300,19 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6779 = {
.init_soc_specific = NULL,
};

+static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6795 = {
+ .regs = mt6795_regs,
+ .type = PWRAP_MT6795,
+ .arb_en_all = 0x3f,
+ .int_en_all = ~(u32)(BIT(31) | BIT(2) | BIT(1)),
+ .int1_en_all = 0,
+ .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
+ .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD,
+ .caps = PWRAP_CAP_RESET | PWRAP_CAP_DCM,
+ .init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
+ .init_soc_specific = pwrap_mt6795_init_soc_specific,

TBH, I don't know if variables should be reordered in alphabetic order
or keep the order of other structures.
it's just to notify.

+};
+
static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6797 = {
.regs = mt6797_regs,
.type = PWRAP_MT6797,
@@ -2318,6 +2446,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt2701 },
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6765-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6765 },
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6779 },
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6795-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6795 },
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6797-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6797 },
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6873 },
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt7622 },
--
2.40.0


Regards,
Alex