Re: [PATCH] clockevents/drivers/i8253: Do not zero timer counter in shutdown
From: Wei Liu
Date: Wed Apr 12 2023 - 21:28:44 EST
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:02:04PM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 11:04 PM
> > To: Michael Kelley (LINUX) <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>; KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui
> > <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > bp@xxxxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents/drivers/i8253: Do not zero timer counter in
> > shutdown
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> > > From: lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday,
> > > February 6, 2023 5:15 PM
> > > >
> > > > Zeroing the counter register in pit_shutdown() isn't actually
> > > > supposed to stop it from counting, will causes the PIT to start
> > > > running again, From the spec:
> > > >
> > > > The largest possible initial count is 0; this is equivalent to 216 for
> > > > binary counting and 104 for BCD counting.
> > > >
> > > > The Counter does not stop when it reaches zero. In Modes 0, 1, 4, and 5
> > the
> > > > Counter "wraps around" to the highest count, either FFFF hex for binary
> > > > count- ing or 9999 for BCD counting, and continues counting.
> > > >
> > > > Mode 0 is typically used for event counting. After the Control Word is
> > > > written, OUT is initially low, and will remain low until the Counter
> > > > reaches zero. OUT then goes high and remains high until a new count or a
> > > > new Mode 0 Control Word is written into the Counter.
> > > >
> > > > Hyper-V and KVM follow the spec, the issue that 35b69a42
> > > > "(clockevents/drivers/
> > > > i8253: Add support for PIT shutdown quirk") fixed is in i8253
> > > > drivers, not Hyper-v, so delete the zero timer counter register in
> > > > shutdown, and delete PIT shutdown quirk for Hyper-v
> > >
> > > From the standpoint of Hyper-V, I'm good with this change. But
> > > there's a risk that old hardware might not be compliant with the spec,
> > > and needs the zero'ing for some reason. The experts in the x86 space
> > > will be in the best position to assess the risk.
> >
> > Yep, my feeling exactly. My input is purely from reading those crusty old specs.
>
>
>
> Ping
I guess you want Thomas Gleixner and Daniel Lezcano's attention.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Li