Re: [V6 0/9] Add Tegra234 HTE support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/04/2023 19:14, Dipen Patel wrote:
> On 4/14/23 12:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/04/2023 02:44, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>> This patch series mainly adds support for the Tegra234 HTE provider. In
>>> addition, it addresses dt binding comments which prompted code
>>> changes in the existing HTE provider driver without breaking the
>>> Tegra194 provider. The comments raised concern how existing code
>>> retrieves gpio controller node
>>> (the node is used to help namespace conversion between HTE and GPIOLIB).
>>> To help simplify that process, new DT property is suggested which adds
>>> gpio controller node in the HTE provider binding as phandle property. To
>>> conlude this patch series:
>>> - adds Tegra234 HTE provider
>>> - modifies existing provider code to address new dt binding for Tegra234
>>> without breaking it for the Tegra194 chip.
>>>
>>> The V1 patch series:
>>> - Adds tegra Tegra234 HTE(timestamp) provider supports.
>>> - Updates MAINTAINERS file for git tree, mail list fields.
>>> - Updates devicetree and API documentations.
>>> - Enables HTE subsystem, Tegra194 and Tegra234 HTE providers
>>> by default in arm64 defconfig and dts files.
>>
>> All your emails miss PATCH prefix. Use `git format-patch` to generate
>> proper versioned patch. Stripping important part messes up with our
>> filters. We have quite a lot of emails, so proper filtering is important.
> 
> My bad...excitement of sending the patch series got hold of me :) Now I have realized
> it is been happening since the beginning. Since all the previous patches have been
> sent without PATCH prefix, is it ok for this version as it is or do you want me to resend
> with proper prefix?
> 

It's okay for me, no need to resend. I just wanted to bring this to your
attention, so future patchsets can be improved.

Best regards,
Krzysztof