Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the mm-stable tree

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 01:59:12PM +0100, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   23baf831a32c0 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely")
> 
> from the mm-stable tree and commit:
> 
>   56e51681246e5 ("drm/ttm: revert "Reduce the number of used allocation orders for TTM pages"")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> index 4db3982057be8,dfce896c4baeb..0000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> 
> [Just the version in mm]

Note there was a ppc compile fail, which is why we pushed the ttm revert.
That /should/ be fixed now, but would be good if you can confirm?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch