Re: [regression] Bug 217069 - Wake on Lan is broken on r8169 since 6.2

[Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

On 16.04.23 14:35, Jianmin Lv wrote:
> From the feedbacks, the WOL issue has been fixed, and I have submitted a
> fixed patch to ACPICA, which has been reviewing in last week (Rafael
> also looked into the fixed patch).

Great, many thx. I looked for something like that, but failed to find it.

FWIW, a link to the patch submission would have been nice. I tried to
find it just now, but maybe it's not on lore.kernel.org or I did
something stupid. And
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/acpica-devel/ seems to lack
behind or might not be the list you submitted the patch to. Whatever.

> There are two kinds of issues in the bug, one is WOL failed in kexec
> reboot, another is WOL failed in cold reboot. The former one still exist
> after reverted patch(5c62d5aab8752e5ee7bfbe75ed6060db1c787f98),
> so this issue is not caused by the reverted patch. The second is caused
> by the reverted patch, and has been fixed with my provided patch.
> 
> Please see:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c54
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c59

I'll post a quick update there.

Thx again.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.

> On 2023/4/14 下午8:48, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 19.03.23 08:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>>> On 22.02.23 08:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
>>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
>>>> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 :
>>>
>>> An issue that looked like a network bug was now bisected and it turns
>>> out it's cause by 5c62d5aab875 ("ACPICA: Events: Support fixed PCIe wake
>>> event") which Huacai Chen provided. Could you take a look at the ticket
>>> linked above?
>>
>> Jianmin did get close to a proper fix a while ago
>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c46 ), but it
>> appears there wasn't any progress to fix this during the last week. Or
>> did I miss it?
>>
>> This is kinda unsatisfying, as the culprit is now known for nearly four
>> weeks; especially as this is a issue that is present in 6.2 since it was
>> released and would have been possible to fix there and in mainline with
>> a simple revert. We even got close to one two weeks ago already
>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069#c49 ).
>>
>> #sigh
>>
>> I'd say we should revert this. Rafael, what's your opinion here?
>>
>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>> -- 
>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>
>> #regzbot poke
>>
> 
> 
>