Re: kernel error at led trigger "phy0tpt"

[Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

[adding Matthias to the list of recipients, who back then applied to
culprit]

Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.

AngeloGioacchino, Has any progress been made to fix below regression? It
doesn't look like it from here, hence I wondered if it fall through the
cracks.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.

#regzbot poke

On 27.03.23 10:23, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 26/03/23 15:23, Bagas Sanjaya ha scritto:
>> On 3/26/23 02:20, Tobias Dahms wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> the bisection gives following result:
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa is the first bad commit
>>> commit 18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa
>>> Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date:   Tue May 17 12:47:08 2022 +0200
>>>
>>>      soc: mediatek: pwrap: Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of custom
>>> function
>>>
>>>      Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address
>>>      through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that
>>>      the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do.
>>>      Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead
>>>      use the read_poll_timeout macro.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      Link:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517104712.24579-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>      Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>> OK, I'm updating the regression status:
>>
>> #regzbot introduced: 18c7deca2b8125
>>
>> And for replying, don't top-post, but rather reply inline with
>> appropriate context instead; hence I cut the replied context.
>>
> 
> There are two possible solutions to that, specifically, either:
>  1. Change readx_poll_timeout() to readx_poll_timeout_atomic(); or
>  2. Fix the mt6323-led driver so that this operation gets done
>     out of atomic context, which is IMO the option to prefer.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
> 
>