Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: Split tdp_mmu_pages to private and shared lists
From: Zhi Wang
Date: Mon Apr 17 2023 - 15:37:07 EST
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 20:19:17 +0000
Sagi Shahar <sagis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch is actually adding a separate counter for accounting private
tdp mmu page not really introducing a new tdp_mmu_pages list for private
pages. I guess better refine the tittle to reflect what this patch
is doing.
> tdp_mmu_pages holds all the active pages used by the mmu. When we
> transfer the state during intra-host migration we need to transfer the
> private pages but not the shared ones.
>
Maybe explain a little bit about how the shared one is processed. Guess
one sentence is enough.
> Keeping them in separate counters makes this transfer more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index ae377eec81987..5ed70cd9d74bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1426,9 +1426,12 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> struct task_struct *nx_huge_page_recovery_thread;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - /* The number of TDP MMU pages across all roots. */
> + /* The number of non-private TDP MMU pages across all roots. */
> atomic64_t tdp_mmu_pages;
>
> + /* Same as tdp_mmu_pages but only for private pages. */
> + atomic64_t tdp_private_mmu_pages;
> +
> /*
> * List of struct kvm_mmu_pages being used as roots.
> * All struct kvm_mmu_pages in the list should have
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 58a236a69ec72..327dee4f6170e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> destroy_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
>
> WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
> + WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_private_mmu_pages));
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots));
>
> /*
> @@ -373,13 +374,19 @@ static void handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
> static void tdp_account_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, +1);
> - atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> + if (is_private_sp(sp))
> + atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_private_mmu_pages);
> + else
> + atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> }
>
> static void tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, -1);
> - atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> + if (is_private_sp(sp))
> + atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_private_mmu_pages);
> + else
> + atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> }
>
> /**