Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform notification for type4 and shared interrupt

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2023/4/14 21:48, Robbie King 写道:
> Sorry for the delay.  I ran my simple stress test against the patch set and
> saw no issues.  For the record it is by no means a thorough regression, but it
> has illuminated issues in the past.
Thanks for your testing.
> The test itself uses a "heartbeat" module in the SCP firmware that generates
> notifications at a programmable interval.  The stress test is simply generating
> these heartbeats (SCP to AP notifications) while also generating protocol version
> queries (AP to SCP).  The notifications are sequence numbered to verify none are
> lost, however SCP to AP notification support does not support SCP generating
> notifications faster than the AP can process them, so the heartbeat rate must be
> reasonably slow (on the order of 10s of millliseconds).
I understand your concern. I think this doesn't get int the way of what 
we are doing.

My stress tests were also run in type3 and type4 concurrent scenarios.
There were two drivers using type3 to send command looply on platform.
In the firmware terminal window,
there were two channels for type4 to generate notifications from 
platform at the 1ms(even shorter) interval.
I didn't find anything issues in this stress after running a couple of 
hours.

@Robbie King and @Sudeep, what do you think of my test?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:05 PM
> To: Robbie King <robbiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx; wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx; zhangzekun11@xxxxxxxxxx; wangxiongfeng2@xxxxxxxxxx; tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx; guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx; xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx; wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx; huangdaode@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform notification for type4 and shared interrupt
>
>
> 在 2023/4/11 22:47, Robbie King 写道:
> > Apologies, missed earlier emails.  Will make this a priority for the week.
> Thanks. Looking forward to you reply.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2023 9:27 PM
> > To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>; Robbie King
> > <robbiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx;
> > wanghuiqiang@xxxxxxxxxx; zhangzekun11@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > wangxiongfeng2@xxxxxxxxxx; tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx; xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx; wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > huangdaode@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform
> > notification for type4 and shared interrupt
> >
> >
> > 在 2023/3/27 20:31, lihuisong (C) 写道:
> > > 在 2023/3/27 19:33, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 07:11:33PM +0800, Huisong Li wrote:
> > > > > PCC supports processing platform notification for slave subspaces
> > > > > and shared interrupt for multiple subspaces.
> > > > Other than a super minor nit in the patch 1/2, this looks good to me.
> > > > It would be good if we can get tested-by from Robbie King
> > > > <robbiek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > > Thanks for your review.😁
> > >
> > > @Robbie King, can you give us some feedback?
> > > Looking forward to you reply.
> > @Robbie King, kindly ping.