On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:10:47PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
Hi,You might tomorrow. So please don't create problems like this when you
On 4/17/2023 11:42 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:28:18AM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:Sorry, I don't own a system with multiple PMCs. Anyways, do we even have
Hi,Can you please show the output of the directory
On 4/15/2023 11:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 01:49:10PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:I'm sorry I didn't understand the question. We would have separate directories
IOM status has a crucial role during debugging to check theWhat happens when you have more than one device in the system at the
current state of the type-C port.
There are ways to fetch the status, but all those require the
IOM port status offset, which could change with platform.
Make a debugfs directory for intel_pmc_mux and expose the status
under it per port basis.
Signed-off-by: Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
1. Remove static declaration of the debugfs root for 'intel_pmc_mux'
2. Remove explicitly defined one-liner functions
drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
index 34e4188a40ff..1d43b111781e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h>
#include <linux/usb/typec_dp.h>
#include <linux/usb/typec_tbt.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <asm/intel_scu_ipc.h>
@@ -639,9 +640,34 @@ static int pmc_usb_probe_iom(struct pmc_usb *pmc)
return 0;
}
+static int port_iom_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
+{
+ struct pmc_usb_port *port = s->private;
+
+ update_port_status(port);
+ seq_printf(s, "0x%08x\n", port->iom_status);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(port_iom_status);
+
+static void pmc_mux_port_debugfs_init(struct pmc_usb_port *port,
+ struct dentry *pmc_mux_debugfs_root)
+{
+ struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
+ char name[6];
+
+ snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "port%d", port->usb3_port - 1);
+
+ debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, pmc_mux_debugfs_root);
+ debugfs_create_file("iom_status", 0400, debugfs_dir, port,
+ &port_iom_status_fops);
+}
+
static int pmc_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
+ struct dentry *pmc_mux_debugfs_root;
struct pmc_usb *pmc;
int i = 0;
int ret;
@@ -674,6 +700,8 @@ static int pmc_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ pmc_mux_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("intel_pmc_mux", NULL);
same time?
for all the ports which would contain the 'iom_status' file, thus representing
status for all the ports individually.
Can you rephrase the question since I guess you had something else in mind?
/sys/kernel/debug/intel_pmc_mux/ with multiple pmc devices in the system
at the same time?
a system with such design?
do not have to.
greg k-h