Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: s3c64xx: support interrupt based pio mode

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 19/04/2023 08:06, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Interrupt based pio mode is supported to reduce CPU load.
> If transfer size is larger than 32 byte, it is processed using interrupt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> index cf3060b2639b..ce1afb9a4ed4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_HALFWORD	(1<<17)
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_WORD		(2<<17)
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_MASK		(3<<17)
> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_RX_RDY_LVL		GENMASK(16, 11)
> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_RX_RDY_LVL_SHIFT	11
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_SELF_LOOPBACK		(1<<3)
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_RXDMA_ON		(1<<2)
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_TXDMA_ON		(1<<1)
> @@ -114,6 +116,8 @@
>  
>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_TRAILCNT		S3C64XX_SPI_MAX_TRAILCNT
>  
> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_POLLING_SIZE	32
> +
>  #define msecs_to_loops(t) (loops_per_jiffy / 1000 * HZ * t)
>  #define is_polling(x)	(x->cntrlr_info->polling)
>  
> @@ -552,10 +556,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
>  }
>  
>  static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
> -				struct spi_transfer *xfer)
> +				struct spi_transfer *xfer, int use_irq)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *regs = sdd->regs;
>  	unsigned long val;
> +	unsigned long time;
>  	u32 status;
>  	int loops;
>  	u32 cpy_len;
> @@ -563,17 +568,24 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
>  	int ms;
>  	u32 tx_time;
>  
> -	/* sleep during signal transfer time */
> -	status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
> -	if (RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd) < xfer->len) {
> -		tx_time = (xfer->len * 8 * 1000 * 1000) / sdd->cur_speed;
> -		usleep_range(tx_time / 2, tx_time);
> -	}

You just added this code. Adding and immediately removing it, suggests
this should be one patch.


Best regards,
Krzysztof