Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Return error on write frequency

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> Currently when the uncore_write() returns error, it is silently
> ignored. Return error to user space when uncore_write() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch has no dependency on TPMI patches for uncore support.
> 
>  .../x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c    | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> index cb24de9e97dc..fa8f14c925ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
> @@ -44,14 +44,18 @@ static ssize_t store_min_max_freq_khz(struct uncore_data *data,
>  				      int min_max)
>  {
>  	unsigned int input;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &input))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&uncore_lock);
> -	uncore_write(data, input, min_max);
> +	ret = uncore_write(data, input, min_max);
>  	mutex_unlock(&uncore_lock);
>  
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return count;
>  }

Shouldn't this have Fixes tag?

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
 i.