Re: [RFC 0/2] vduse: add support for networking devices
From: Maxime Coquelin
Date: Fri Apr 21 2023 - 10:29:26 EST
On 4/21/23 07:51, Jason Wang wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:16 PM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/20/23 06:34, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:43 PM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This small series enables virtio-net device type in VDUSE.
With it, basic operation have been tested, both with
virtio-vdpa and vhost-vdpa using DPDK Vhost library series
adding VDUSE support [0] using split rings layout.
Control queue support (and so multiqueue) has also been
tested, but require a Kernel series from Jason Wang
relaxing control queue polling [1] to function reliably.
Other than that, we have identified a few gaps:
1. Reconnection:
a. VDUSE_VQ_GET_INFO ioctl() returns always 0 for avail
index, even after the virtqueue has already been
processed. Is that expected? I have tried instead to
get the driver's avail index directly from the avail
ring, but it does not seem reliable as I sometimes get
"id %u is not a head!\n" warnings. Also such solution
would not be possible with packed ring, as we need to
know the wrap counters values.
Looking at the codes, it only returns the value that is set via
set_vq_state(). I think it is expected to be called before the
datapath runs.
So when bound to virtio-vdpa, it is expected to return 0. But we need
to fix the packed virtqueue case, I wonder if we need to call
set_vq_state() explicitly in virtio-vdpa before starting the device.
When bound to vhost-vdpa, Qemu will call VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE which
will end up a call to set_vq_state(). Unfortunately, it doesn't
support packed ring which needs some extension.
b. Missing IOCTLs: it would be handy to have new IOCTLs to
query Virtio device status,
What's the use case of this ioctl? It looks to me userspace is
notified on each status change now:
static int vduse_dev_set_status(struct vduse_dev *dev, u8 status)
{
struct vduse_dev_msg msg = { 0 };
msg.req.type = VDUSE_SET_STATUS;
msg.req.s.status = status;
return vduse_dev_msg_sync(dev, &msg);
}
The idea was to be able to query the status at reconnect time, and
neither having to assume its value nor having to store its value in a
file (the status could change while the VDUSE application is stopped,
but maybe it would receive the notification at reconnect).
I see.
I will prototype using a tmpfs file to save needed information, and see
if it works.
It might work but then the API is not self contained. Maybe it's
better to have a dedicated ioctl.
and retrieve the config
space set at VDUSE_CREATE_DEV time.
In order to be safe, VDUSE avoids writable config space. Otherwise
drivers could block on config writing forever. That's why we don't do
it now.
The idea was not to make the config space writable, but just to be able
to fetch what was filled at VDUSE_CREATE_DEV time.
With the tmpfs file, we can avoid doing that and just save the config
space there.
Same as the case for status.
I have cooked a DPDK patch to support reconnect with a tmpfs file as
suggested by Yongji:
https://gitlab.com/mcoquelin/dpdk-next-virtio/-/commit/53913f2b1155b02c44d5d3d298aafd357e7a8c48
That's still rough around the edges, but it seems to work reliably
for the testing I have done so far. We'll certainly want to use the
tmpfs memory to directly store available indexes and wrap counters to
avoid introducing overhead in the datapath. The tricky part will be to
manage NUMA affinity.
Regards,
Maxime
Thanks
We need to harden the config write before we can proceed to this I think.
2. VDUSE application as non-root:
We need to run the VDUSE application as non-root. There
is some race between the time the UDEV rule is applied
and the time the device starts being used. Discussing
with Jason, he suggested we may have a VDUSE daemon run
as root that would create the VDUSE device, manages its
rights and then pass its file descriptor to the VDUSE
app. However, with current IOCTLs, it means the VDUSE
daemon would need to know several information that
belongs to the VDUSE app implementing the device such
as supported Virtio features, config space, etc...
If we go that route, maybe we should have a control
IOCTL to create the device which would just pass the
device type. Then another device IOCTL to perform the
initialization. Would that make sense?
I think so. We can hear from others.
3. Coredump:
In order to be able to perform post-mortem analysis, DPDK
Vhost library marks pages used for vrings and descriptors
buffers as MADV_DODUMP using madvise(). However with
VDUSE it fails with -EINVAL. My understanding is that we
set VM_DONTEXPAND flag to the VMAs and madvise's
MADV_DODUMP fails if it is present. I'm not sure to
understand why madvise would prevent MADV_DODUMP if
VM_DONTEXPAND is set. Any thoughts?
Adding Peter who may know the answer.
Thanks!
Maxime
Thanks
[0]: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=27594&state=%2A&archive=both
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CACGkMEtgrxN3PPwsDo4oOsnsSLJfEmBEZ0WvjGRr3whU+QasUg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
Maxime Coquelin (2):
vduse: validate block features only with block devices
vduse: enable Virtio-net device type
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2