Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes

[Michael Niewöhner]

On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 18:40 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun Apr 23, 2023 at 6:36 PM EEST, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 17:15 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > > > > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > > > > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For all:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > > BR, Jarkko
> > > > 
> > > > Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
> > > steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
> > > flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.
> > > 
> > > BR, Jarkko
> > 
> > I wonder, if it makes sense to submit this patch series to longterm and/or
> > at
> > least stable?
> 
> it's a feature, so I don't think so.
> 
> BR, Jarkko

IMO it's a fix of a incomplete/broken implementation of that feature. I mean,
the code even tested for interrupts and printed an error. It was just missed to
enable them (TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ).