Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Enable CSI and ISI Nodes
From: Adam Ford
Date: Sun Apr 23 2023 - 22:23:28 EST
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 7:46 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 04:26:55PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > The CSI in the imx8mn is the same as what is used in the imx8mm,
> > but it's routed to the ISI on the Nano. Add both the ISI and CSI
> > nodes, and pointing them to each other. Since the CSI capture is
> > dependent on an attached camera, mark both ISI and CSI as
> > disabled by default.
>
> I'd then write the subject line as "Add CSI and ISI nodes".
That makes sense, especially since I disabled them by default.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > index 8be8f090e8b8..102550b41f22 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > @@ -1104,6 +1104,24 @@ dsim_from_lcdif: endpoint {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + isi: isi@32e20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-isi";
> > + reg = <0x32e20000 0x100>;
>
> The i.MX8MN reference manual documents the ISI registers block size to
> be 64kB. Should we use the same here, even if all the registers we need
> are within the first 256 bytes ?
I can do that.
>
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_DISP_AXI_ROOT>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_DISP_APB_ROOT>;
> > + clock-names = "axi", "apb";
> > + fsl,blk-ctrl = <&disp_blk_ctrl>;
> > + power-domains = <&disp_blk_ctrl IMX8MN_DISPBLK_PD_ISI>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + port {
> > + isi_in: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_csi_out>;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> This will fail to validate against the ISI DT binding, as they require a
> "ports" node. When a single port is present using a "port" node directly
> is fine from an OF graph point of view, but to avoid too much complexity
> in the ISI binding the consensus was to always require a "ports" node
> for the ISI.
Argh! I pulled from the wrong test repo. I remember the discussion
from a few months back. I'll fix it and the others when I submit V2.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > disp_blk_ctrl: blk-ctrl@32e28000 {
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-disp-blk-ctrl", "syscon";
> > reg = <0x32e28000 0x100>;
> > @@ -1147,6 +1165,42 @@ disp_blk_ctrl: blk-ctrl@32e28000 {
> > #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + mipi_csi: mipi-csi@32e30000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-csi2";
> > + reg = <0x32e30000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_CAMERA_PIXEL>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_CSI1_PHY_REF>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MN_SYS_PLL2_1000M>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_SYS_PLL2_1000M>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <333000000>;
> > + clock-frequency = <333000000>;
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_DISP_APB_ROOT>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_CAMERA_PIXEL>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_CSI1_PHY_REF>,
> > + <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_DISP_AXI_ROOT>;
> > + clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy", "axi";
> > + power-domains = <&disp_blk_ctrl IMX8MN_DISPBLK_PD_MIPI_CSI>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + ports {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + port@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > +
> > + mipi_csi_out: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&isi_in>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > usbotg1: usb@32e40000 {
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usb", "fsl,imx7d-usb", "fsl,imx27-usb";
> > reg = <0x32e40000 0x200>;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart