Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ufs: core: Add error handling for MCQ mode

[Bart Van Assche]

On 5/3/23 21:18, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> On 4/25/2023 5:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 4/17/23 14:05, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> > > +        /* MCQ mode */
> > > +        if (is_mcq_enabled(hba))
> > > +            return ufshcd_clear_cmds(hba, 1UL << lrbp->task_tag);
> >
> > The above code will trigger an overflow if lrbp->task_tag >= 8 * sizeof(unsigned long). That's not acceptable.
> This ufshcd_clear_cmds() uses a bit map. There are multiple places in the UFS code have this limitation if the queue depth grows to be greater than 64. I am thinking:
> 1. Current ufs controllers in the market probably support queue depth 64 or less, so it may not be a problem today if host controller cap is set to 64 queue depth, but can be a problem in multiple places in the code later.
> 2. In mcq mode, we can pass a tag number into this api ufshcd_clear_cmds(); while in SDB mode, pass the tag's bit mask as before.
> 3. Use sbitmask() to support large queue depth? Thanks for any suggestions.

The UFS driver is the only block driver I know that tracks which commands
are pending in a bitmap. Please pass the lrbp pointer or the task_tag directly
to ufshcd_clear_cmds() instead of passing a bitmap to that function. Please
also introduce a loop in ufshcd_eh_device_reset_handler() around the
ufshcd_clear_cmds() call instead of passing a bitmap to ufshcd_clear_cmds().

> > >   static irqreturn_t ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > >   {
> > > +    struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
> > > +    u32 hwq_num, utag;
> > > +    int tag;
> > > +
> > >       /* Resetting interrupt aggregation counters first and reading the
> > >        * DOOR_BELL afterward allows us to handle all the completed requests.
> > >        * In order to prevent other interrupts starvation the DB is read once
> > > @@ -5580,7 +5590,22 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > >        * Ignore the ufshcd_poll() return value and return IRQ_HANDLED since we
> > >        * do not want polling to trigger spurious interrupt complaints.
> > >        */
> > > -    ufshcd_poll(hba->host, UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
> > > +    if (!is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
> > > +        ufshcd_poll(hba->host, UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
> > > +        goto out;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    /* MCQ mode */
> > > +    for (tag = 0; tag < hba->nutrs; tag++) {
> > > +        lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> > > +        if (lrbp->cmd) {
> > > +            utag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scsi_cmd_to_rq(lrbp->cmd));
> > > +            hwq_num = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(utag);
> > > +            ufshcd_poll(hba->host, hwq_num);
> > > +        }
> > > +    }
> >
> > Is my understanding correct that ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() is only called from single doorbell code paths and hence that the above change is not necessary?
> ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() can be invoked from MCQ mode such as the ufshcd_err_handler() as below:
> ufshcd_err_handler()-->ufshcd_complete_requests()-->ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

Since there are multiple statements in ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() that assume
SDB mode (resetting SDB interrupt aggregation and calling ufshcd_poll()), please
move the is_mcq_enabled() test from ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() into the
callers of that function.

Thanks,

Bart.