Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs-idmapping tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed May 10 2023 - 21:08:05 EST
On Wed, 10 May 2023 06:48:39 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, since Linus didn't like the original approach, it was redone
> and that particular patch was originally forgotten and then redone
> without the 'nonblock' variable. So you should just ignore the
> old version, and Christian should just drop that branch from his
> for-next tree as it's dead.
That appears to have been done now, thanks.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature