Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Pages pinned in memory through extra refcounts can not be migrated.
Currently as isolate_migratepages_block() scans pages for
compaction, it skips any pinned anonymous pages. All non-migratable
pages should be skipped and not just the anonymous pinned pages.
This patch adds a check for extra refcounts on a page to determine
if the page can be migrated. This was seen as a real issue on a
customer workload where a large number of pages were pinned by vfio
on the host and any attempts to allocate hugepages resulted in
significant amount of cpu time spent in either direct compaction or
in kcompatd scanning vfio pinned pages over and over again that can
not be migrated.
With the patch below, the cycles for kcompactd disappeared?
Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Update comments in the code (Suggested by Andrew)
- Use PagePrivate() instead of page_has_private() (Suggested
- Pass mapping to page_has_extrarefs() (Suggested by Matthew)
- Use page_ref_count() (Suggested by Matthew)
- Rename is_pinned_page() to reflect its function more
accurately (Suggested by Matthew)
mm/compaction.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 5a9501e0ae01..837f20df2bbb 100644
@@ -764,6 +764,34 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
+ * Check if this base page should be skipped from isolation because
+ * it has extra refcounts that will prevent it from being migrated.
+ * This function is called for regular pages only, and not
+ * for THP or hugetlbfs pages. This code is inspired by similar code
+ * in migrate_vma_check_page(), can_split_folio() and
+ * folio_migrate_mapping()
+static inline bool page_has_extrarefs(struct page *page,
Better to be named as page_has_extra_refs()?
+ struct address_space *mapping)
+ unsigned long extra_refs;
+ /* anonymous page can have extra ref from swap cache */
+ if (mapping)
+ extra_refs = 1 + PagePrivate(page);
+ extra_refs = PageSwapCache(page) ? 1 : 0;
IIUC, mapping != NULL if PageSwapCache(page) is true. Please check the
implementation of page_mapping().
And even if mapping == NULL, the extra_refs should be 1, because we have
elevated the page refcount in isolate_migratepages_block() before
checking whether the page is pinned. IIUC, this is the original
behavior. Or, we can add "- 1" in the following checking.
+ * This is an admittedly racy check but good enough to determine
+ * if a page is pinned and can not be migrated
+ if ((page_ref_count(page) - extra_refs) > page_mapcount(page))
+ return true;
+ return false;
* isolate_migratepages_block() - isolate all migrate-able pages within
* a single pageblock
@@ -992,12 +1020,12 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
- * Migration will fail if an anonymous page is pinned in memory,
- * so avoid taking lru_lock and isolating it unnecessarily in an
- * admittedly racy check.
+ * Migration will fail if a page has extra refcounts
+ * preventing it from migrating, so avoid taking
+ * lru_lock and isolating it unnecessarily
mapping = page_mapping(page);
- if (!mapping && (page_count(page) - 1) > total_mapcount(page))
+ if (page_has_extrarefs(page, mapping))