Re: [PATCH v1] i2c: designware: Handle invalid SMBus block data response length

From: Jarkko Nikula
Date: Wed May 24 2023 - 08:35:49 EST


Hi

On 5/23/23 11:21, Tam Nguyen wrote:
In I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA case, the I2C Designware driver does not
handle correctly when it receives the length of SMBus block data
response from SMBus slave device, which is outside the range 1-32 bytes.
Consequently, the I2C Designware bus is stuck and cannot recover.
Because if IC_EMPTYFIFO_HOLD_MASTER_EN is set, which cannot be detected
from the registers, the controller can be disabled if the STOP bit is set.
But it is only set after receiving block data response length.

Hence, to prevent the bus from stuck condition, after receiving the
invalid block data response length, the driver will read another byte
with STOP bit set.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Tam Nguyen <tamnguyenchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
index 55ea91a63382..94dadd785ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
@@ -527,8 +527,19 @@ i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_DATA_CMD, &tmp);
/* Ensure length byte is a valid value */
- if (flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN &&
- (tmp & DW_IC_DATA_CMD_DAT) <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && tmp > 0) {
+ if (flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN) {
+ /*
+ * if IC_EMPTYFIFO_HOLD_MASTER_EN is set, which cannot be
+ * detected from the registers, the controller can be
+ * disabled if the STOP bit is set. But it is only set
+ * after receiving block data response length in
+ * I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA case. That needs to read
+ * another byte with STOP bit set when the block data
+ * response length is invalid to complete the transaction.
+ */
+ if ((tmp & DW_IC_DATA_CMD_DAT) > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX || tmp == 0)
+ tmp = 1;
+
len = i2c_dw_recv_len(dev, tmp);
}
*buf++ = tmp;

Looks otherwise good to me but I'm wondering the "tmp == 0" test can it have the bit 11 set (on a HW where it's supported) and should it be covered with DW_IC_DATA_CMD_DAT mask too? Please see commit f53f15ba5a85 ("i2c: designware: Get right data length").