Yes, will remove the duplicate definitions and will reuse the existing ops.
On 19.05.2023 14:49, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
Hi,Well, your patch makes it unconditional (modulo programmer error) so
Thanks Konrad for your review!
On 5/10/2023 1:36 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 9.05.2023 18:12, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>Isn't this commit "write to PLL_TEST_CTL_U2 on LUCID_EVO" instead?
Add support for lucid ole pll ops to configure and control the
lucid ole pll. The lucid ole pll has an additional test control
register which is required to be programmed, add support to
program the same.
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Meaninglessly duplicating ops does not seem useful.
Konrad
Though we are reusing same ops for EVO and OLE, PLL_TEST_CTL_U2 register programming is applicable only to OLE PLL type.
I think that makes little sense.. A comment would be enough, imo.
Konrad
And PLL type is useful to properly refer respective hardware datasheets. Hence added separate ops for OLE PLL type.