Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM_PIDFD

[Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn]

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:19 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2023 11:47:50 +0100 Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > I will send SO_PEERPIDFD as an independent patch too, because it
> > > doesn't require this change with CONFIG_UNIX
> > > and we can avoid waiting until CONFIG_UNIX change will be merged.
> > > I've a feeling that the discussion around making CONFIG_UNIX  to be a
> > > boolean won't be easy and fast ;-)
> >
> > Thank you, that sounds great to me, I can start using SO_PEERPIDFD
> > independently of SCM_PIDFD, there's no hard dependency between the
> > two.
>
> How about you put the UNIX -> bool patch at the end of the series,
> (making it a 4 patch series) and if there's a discussion about it
> I'll just skip it and apply the first 3 patches?

Sure, I will do that!

>
> In the (IMHO more likely) case that there isn't a discussion it saves
> me from remembering to chase you to send that patch ;)

Thanks a lot, Jakub!

Kind regards,
Alex