[PATCH 5/6] riscv: allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value

From: Jisheng Zhang
Date: Fri May 26 2023 - 13:11:41 EST


Currently, riscv defines ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as L1_CACHE_BYTES, I.E
64Bytes, if CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT=y. To support unified kernel
Image, usually we have to enable CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT, thus
it brings some bad effects to for coherent platforms:

Firstly, it wastes memory, kmalloc-96, kmalloc-32, kmalloc-16 and
kmalloc-8 slab caches don't exist any more, they are replaced with
either kmalloc-128 or kmalloc-64.

Secondly, larger than necessary kmalloc aligned allocations results
in unnecessary cache/TLB pressure.

This issue also exists on arm64 platforms. From last year, Catalin
tried to solve this issue by decoupling ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, limiting kmalloc() minimum alignment to
dma_get_cache_alignment() and replacing ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN usage
in various drivers with ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN etc.

One fact we can make use of for riscv: if the CPU doesn't support
ZICBOM or T-HEAD CMO, we know the platform is coherent. Based on
Catalin's work and above fact, we can easily solve the kmalloc align
issue for riscv: we can override dma_get_cache_alignment(), then let
it return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN at the beginning and return 1 once we know
the underlying HW neither supports ZICBOM nor supports T-HEAD CMO.

So what about if the CPU supports ZICBOM and T-HEAD CMO, but all the
devices are dma coherent? Well, we use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as the
kmalloc minimum alignment, nothing changed in this case. This case
can be improved in the future.

After this patch, a simple test of booting to a small buildroot rootfs
on qemu shows:

kmalloc-96 5041 5041 96 ...
kmalloc-64 9606 9606 64 ...
kmalloc-32 5128 5128 32 ...
kmalloc-16 7682 7682 16 ...
kmalloc-8 10246 10246 8 ...

So we save about 1268KB memory. The saving will be much larger in normal
OS env on real HW platforms.

[1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230524171904.3967031-1-catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
index d3036df23ccb..2174fe7bac9a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@

#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
#define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
+#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN (8)
#endif

/*
@@ -23,4 +24,17 @@
#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 16
#endif

+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
+extern int dma_cache_alignment;
+#define dma_get_cache_alignment dma_get_cache_alignment
+static inline int dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
+{
+ return dma_cache_alignment;
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_CACHE_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
index 0e172e2b4751..21b553c299db 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>

static bool noncoherent_supported __ro_after_init;
+int dma_cache_alignment __ro_after_init = ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_cache_alignment);

void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction dir)
@@ -78,5 +80,7 @@ void riscv_noncoherent_supported(bool cmo)
WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
"Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
noncoherent_supported = true;
+ } else {
+ dma_cache_alignment = 1;
}
}
--
2.40.1