Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

On 5/26/23 16:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> By popular demand, a new and improved version :-)
>
> New since -v1 ( https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526150549.250372621@xxxxxxxxxxxxx )
>
>   - much improved interface for lock guards: guard() and scoped () { }
>     as suggested by Linus.

<name bikeshedding>

I know I'm the one who hinted at C++ "std::scoped_lock" as a similar 
preexisting API, but I find that "scoped()" is weird in the newly 
proposed form. "scoped_lock" is fine considering that "scoped" is an 
adjective applying to "lock", but in the case of e.g. scoped(rcu) { }, 
then we are really declaring a "scope" of type "rcu". I suspect that in 
this case:

scope(rcu) { }

would be less unexpected than the adjective form:

scoped(rcu) { }

Especially if we go for the name "guard()", rather than the adjective 
guarded(), for its counterpart.

Thanks,

Mathieu


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com