Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] dt-bindings: dma: Add support for SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs

From: Bhupesh Sharma
Date: Mon May 29 2023 - 02:13:38 EST


Hi Vinod,

> On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 00:52, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add new compatible for BAM DMA engine version v1.7.4 which is
> found on Qualcomm SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs. Since its very similar
> to v1.7.0 used on SM8150 like SoCs, mark the comptible scheme
> accordingly.
>
> While at it, also update qcom,bam-dma bindings to add comments
> which describe the BAM DMA versions used in SM8150 and SM8250 SoCs.
> This provides an easy reference for identifying the actual BAM DMA
> version available on Qualcomm SoCs.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> index f1ddcf672261..c663b6102f50 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
> @@ -15,13 +15,19 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
> - - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
> - # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
> - - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
> - # MSM8916 and SDM845
> - - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
> + - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
> + # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
> + - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
> + # MSM8916, SDM630
> + - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + # SDM845, SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and QCM2290
> + - qcom,bam-v1.7.4
> + - const: qcom,bam-v1.7.0
>
> clocks:
> maxItems: 1
> --
> 2.38.1

Bjorn has applied the dts patches from this series to his tree.
As suggested by him, can you please pick patches [PATCH 1/11] and
[PATCH 2/11] from this series via the 'dmaengine' tree.

Seems some Cc fields got messed up while sending the patchset, so
Cc'ing the dmaengine list again.

Thanks,
Bhupesh