Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add GPU related nodes

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Mon May 29 2023 - 03:39:08 EST



On 28.05.2023 19:07, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23.05.2023 03:15, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add Adreno SMMU, GPU clock controller, GMU and GPU nodes for the
>>> SC8280XP.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>> `make dtbs_check` (see
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
>>
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Dropped gmu_pdc_seq region from &gmu, as it shouldn't have been used.
>>> - Added missing compatible to &adreno_smmu.
>>> - Dropped aoss_qmp clock in &gmu and &adreno_smmu.
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> index d2a2224d138a..329ec2119ecf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc8280xp.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc8280xp.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc-sc8280xp.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sc8280xp.h>
>>> @@ -2331,6 +2332,174 @@ tcsr: syscon@1fc0000 {
>>> reg = <0x0 0x01fc0000 0x0 0x30000>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,adreno-690.0", "qcom,adreno";
>>> +
>>> + reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
>>> + <0 0x03d9e000 0 0x1000>,
>>> + <0 0x03d61000 0 0x800>;
>>> + reg-names = "kgsl_3d0_reg_memory",
>>> + "cx_mem",
>>> + "cx_dbgc";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 300 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + iommus = <&adreno_smmu 0 0xc00>, <&adreno_smmu 1 0xc00>;
>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_opp_table>;
>>> +
>>> + qcom,gmu = <&gmu>;
>>> + interconnects = <&gem_noc MASTER_GFX3D 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>;
>>> + interconnect-names = "gfx-mem";
>>> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + gpu_opp_table: opp-table {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> +
>>> + opp-270000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_LOW_SVS>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <451000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-410000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <410000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1555000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-500000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L1>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1555000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-547000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <547000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L2>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <1555000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-606000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <606000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <2736000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-640000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <640000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM_L1>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <2736000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + opp-690000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <690000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO>;
>>> + opp-peak-kBps = <2736000>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + gmu: gmu@3d6a000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu-690.0", "qcom,adreno-gmu";
>>> + reg = <0 0x03d6a000 0 0x34000>,
>>> + <0 0x03de0000 0 0x10000>,
>>> + <0 0x0b290000 0 0x10000>;
>>> + reg-names = "gmu", "rscc", "gmu_pdc";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 304 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 305 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "hfi", "gmu";
>>> + clocks = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CXO_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_DDRSS_GPU_AXI_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_AHB_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HUB_CX_INT_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HLOS1_VOTE_GPU_SMMU_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "gmu",
>>> + "cxo",
>>> + "axi",
>>> + "memnoc",
>>> + "ahb",
>>> + "hub",
>>> + "smmu_vote";
>>> + power-domains = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GDSC>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_GX_GDSC>;
>>> + power-domain-names = "cx",
>>> + "gx";
>>> + iommus = <&adreno_smmu 5 0xc00>;
>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&gmu_opp_table>;
>>> +
>>> + status = "disabled";
>> I've recently discovered that - and I am not 100% sure - all GMUs are
>> cache-coherent. Could you please ask somebody at qc about this?
>>
>
> AFAIU, GMU's job is controlling the voltage and clock to the GPU.
Not just that, it's only the limited functionality we've implemented
upstream so far.

It doesn't do
> any data transactions on its own.
Of course it does. AP communication is done through MMIO writes and
the GMU talks to RPMh via the GPU RSC directly. Apart from that, some
of the GPU registers (that nota bene don't have anything to do with
the GMU M3 core itself) lay within the GMU address space.


Bjorn noticed that this coherent mask setting downstream may be
a bluff, but I guess we could poke Qualcomm about whether it's
cache-coherent (Akhil, could you say anything about that?).

Konrad

So cache-coherent doesn't make sense to me.
>
> - Mani
>
>>> +
>>> + gmu_opp_table: opp-table {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> +
>>> + opp-200000000 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
>>> + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_MIN_SVS>;
>>> + };
>> Missing 500MHz + RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS
>>
>> (that may be used in the future for hw scheduling)
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + gpucc: clock-controller@3d90000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-gpucc";
>>> + reg = <0 0x03d90000 0 0x9000>;
>>> + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_CLK_SRC>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>;
>>> + clock-names = "bi_tcxo",
>>> + "gcc_gpu_gpll0_clk_src",
>>> + "gcc_gpu_gpll0_div_clk_src";
>> FWIW the driver doesn't use clock-names, but the binding defines it,
>> so I suppose it's fine
>>
>>> +
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_GFX>;
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
>>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + adreno_smmu: iommu@3da0000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", "qcom,adreno-smmu",
>>> + "qcom,smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500";
>>> + reg = <0 0x03da0000 0 0x20000>;
>>> + #iommu-cells = <2>;
>>> + #global-interrupts = <2>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 672 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 673 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 678 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 679 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 680 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 681 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 682 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 683 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 684 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 685 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 686 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 687 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 688 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 689 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +
>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_SNOC_DVM_GFX_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_AHB_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HLOS1_VOTE_GPU_SMMU_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HUB_CX_INT_CLK>,
>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HUB_AON_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "gcc_gpu_memnoc_gfx_clk",
>>> + "gcc_gpu_snoc_dvm_gfx_clk",
>>> + "gpu_cc_ahb_clk",
>>> + "gpu_cc_hlos1_vote_gpu_smmu_clk",
>>> + "gpu_cc_cx_gmu_clk",
>>> + "gpu_cc_hub_cx_int_clk",
>>> + "gpu_cc_hub_aon_clk";
>>> +
>>> + power-domains = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GDSC>;
>>> +
>>> + status = "disabled";
>> This one should be dma-coherent (per downstream, plus 8350's mmu is for sure)
>>
>> Konrad
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> usb_0_hsphy: phy@88e5000 {
>>> compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-usb-hs-phy",
>>> "qcom,usb-snps-hs-5nm-phy";
>