Re: [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8226: Add mdss nodes

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 29.05.2023 14:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 15:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29.05.2023 11:44, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Add the nodes that describe the mdss so that display can work on
>>> MSM8226.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>>> index 42acb9ddb8cc..182d6405032f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8226.dtsi
>>> @@ -636,6 +636,124 @@ smd-edge {
>>>                   label = "lpass";
>>>               };
>>>           };
>>> +
>>> +        mdss: display-subsystem@fd900000 {
>>> +            compatible = "qcom,mdss";
>>> +            reg = <0xfd900000 0x100>, <0xfd924000 0x1000>;
>>> +            reg-names = "mdss_phys", "vbif_phys";
>>> +
>>> +            power-domains = <&mmcc MDSS_GDSC>;
>>> +
>>> +            clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
>>> +                 <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
>>> +                 <&mmcc MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
>>> +            clock-names = "iface", "bus", "vsync";
>> One per line, please
>>
>>> +
>>> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +
>>> +            interrupt-controller;
>>> +            #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> We're not using the irq cell, is that necessary/should that be 0?
> 
> No. With 0 it would mean that there is a single interrupt for mdss source, which clearly is not the case.
Obviously. Derp, sorry.

Konrad
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +            status = "disabled";
>> status should go last
>>
>>> +
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <1>;
>>> +            ranges;
>>> +
>>> +            mdp: display-controller@fd900000 {
>>> +                compatible = "qcom,msm8226-mdp5", "qcom,mdp5";
>>> +                reg = <0xfd900100 0x22000>;
>>> +                reg-names = "mdp_phys";
>>> +
>>> +                interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
>>> +                interrupts = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +                clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
>>> +                     <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
>>> +                     <&mmcc MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
>>> +                     <&mmcc MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
>>> +                clock-names = "iface", "bus", "core", "vsync";
>> One per line, please
>>
>>> +
>>> +                ports {
>>> +                    #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +                    #size-cells = <0>;
>> Would port { work here? I remember one mdss component's bindings
>> didn't allow it but don't recall which one
> 
> Let's use ports /port@0 for uniformity even if there is just a single port always.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +                    port@0 {
>>> +                        reg = <0>;
>>> +                        mdp5_intf1_out: endpoint {
>>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_in>;
>>> +                        };
>>> +                    };
>>> +                };
>>> +            };
>>> +-- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>