Re: [PATCH -fixes] riscv: Fix relocatable kernels with early alternatives using -fno-pie

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Mon May 29 2023 - 15:07:07 EST

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 08:51:57PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On 28/05/2023 15:56, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 03:42:59PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > Hmmm, it still works for me with both clang and gcc-9.
> > gcc-9 is a bit of a relic, do you have more recent compilers lying
> > around? If not, I can try some older compilers at some point.
> >
> > > You don't have to do that now but is there a way I could get your compiled
> > > image? With the sha1 used to build it? Sorry, I don't see what happens, I
> > > need to get my hands dirty in some debug!
> > What do you mean by "sha1"? It falls with v6.4-rc1 which is a stable
> > hash, if that's what you're looking for.
> >
> > Otherwise,
> >
> > (ignore the release crap haha, too lazy to find a proper hosting
> > mechanism)
> Ok, I don't get much info without the symbols, can you also provide the
> vmlinux please? But at least your image does not boot, not during the early
> boot though because the mmu is enabled.

Do you see anything print when you try it? Cos I do not. Iff I have time
tomorrow, I'll go poking with gdb. I'm sorry I have not really done any
investigating, I have been really busy this last week or so with
dt-binding stuff but I should be freer again from tomorrow.

> I tried with gcc-12 and it still works fine on my end, so frustrating!

Crap! Also, should you not be enjoying a public holiday rather than
debugging?! Or maybe debugging is enjoyable for you...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature