Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] erofs: use separate xattr parsers for listxattr/getxattr
From: Gao Xiang
Date: Wed May 31 2023 - 03:18:51 EST
On 2023/5/31 11:13, Jingbo Xu wrote:
There's a callback styled xattr parser, i.e. xattr_foreach(), which is
shared among listxattr and getxattr. Convert it to two separate xattr
parsers for listxattr and getxattr.
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/erofs/xattr.c | 372 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 155 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
index 074743e2b271..438fcf22b230 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct erofs_xattr_iter {
struct erofs_buf buf;
void *kaddr;
erofs_blk_t blkaddr;
- unsigned int ofs;
+ unsigned int ofs, next_ofs;
char *buffer;
int buffer_size, buffer_ofs;
@@ -141,183 +141,6 @@ static int erofs_init_inode_xattrs(struct inode *inode)
return ret;
}
-/*
- * the general idea for these return values is
- * if 0 is returned, go on processing the current xattr;
- * 1 (> 0) is returned, skip this round to process the next xattr;
- * -err (< 0) is returned, an error (maybe ENOXATTR) occurred
- * and need to be handled
- */
-struct xattr_iter_handlers {
- int (*entry)(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it, struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry);
- int (*name)(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it, unsigned int processed, char *buf,
- unsigned int len);
- int (*alloc_buffer)(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it, unsigned int value_sz);
- void (*value)(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it, unsigned int processed, char *buf,
- unsigned int len);
-};
-
-/*
- * Regardless of success or failure, `xattr_foreach' will end up with
- * `ofs' pointing to the next xattr item rather than an arbitrary position.
- */
-static int xattr_foreach(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- const struct xattr_iter_handlers *op,
- unsigned int *tlimit)
-{
- struct erofs_xattr_entry entry;
- unsigned int value_sz, processed, slice;
- int err;
-
- /* 0. fixup blkaddr, ofs, ipage */
- err = erofs_xattr_iter_fixup(it, false);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /*
- * 1. read xattr entry to the memory,
- * since we do EROFS_XATTR_ALIGN
- * therefore entry should be in the page
- */
- entry = *(struct erofs_xattr_entry *)(it->kaddr + it->ofs);
- if (tlimit) {
- unsigned int entry_sz = erofs_xattr_entry_size(&entry);
-
- /* xattr on-disk corruption: xattr entry beyond xattr_isize */
- if (*tlimit < entry_sz) {
- DBG_BUGON(1);
- return -EFSCORRUPTED;
- }
- *tlimit -= entry_sz;
- }
-
- it->ofs += sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_entry);
- value_sz = le16_to_cpu(entry.e_value_size);
-
- /* handle entry */
- err = op->entry(it, &entry);
- if (err) {
- it->ofs += entry.e_name_len + value_sz;
- goto out;
- }
-
- /* 2. handle xattr name (ofs will finally be at the end of name) */
- processed = 0;
-
- while (processed < entry.e_name_len) {
- err = erofs_xattr_iter_fixup(it, true);
- if (err)
- goto out;
-
- slice = min_t(unsigned int, it->sb->s_blocksize - it->ofs,
- entry.e_name_len - processed);
-
- /* handle name */
- err = op->name(it, processed, it->kaddr + it->ofs, slice);
- if (err) {
- it->ofs += entry.e_name_len - processed + value_sz;
- goto out;
- }
-
- it->ofs += slice;
- processed += slice;
- }
-
- /* 3. handle xattr value */
- processed = 0;
-
- if (op->alloc_buffer) {
- err = op->alloc_buffer(it, value_sz);
- if (err) {
- it->ofs += value_sz;
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- while (processed < value_sz) {
- err = erofs_xattr_iter_fixup(it, true);
- if (err)
- goto out;
-
- slice = min_t(unsigned int, it->sb->s_blocksize - it->ofs,
- value_sz - processed);
- op->value(it, processed, it->kaddr + it->ofs, slice);
- it->ofs += slice;
- processed += slice;
- }
-
-out:
- /* xattrs should be 4-byte aligned (on-disk constraint) */
- it->ofs = EROFS_XATTR_ALIGN(it->ofs);
- return err < 0 ? err : 0;
-}
-
-static int erofs_xattr_long_entrymatch(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry)
-{
- struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(it->sb);
- struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf = sbi->xattr_prefixes +
- (entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX_MASK);
-
- if (pf >= sbi->xattr_prefixes + sbi->xattr_prefix_count)
- return -ENOATTR;
-
- if (it->index != pf->prefix->base_index ||
- it->name.len != entry->e_name_len + pf->infix_len)
- return -ENOATTR;
-
- if (memcmp(it->name.name, pf->prefix->infix, pf->infix_len))
- return -ENOATTR;
-
- it->infix_len = pf->infix_len;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int xattr_entrymatch(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry)
-{
- /* should also match the infix for long name prefixes */
- if (entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX)
- return erofs_xattr_long_entrymatch(it, entry);
-
- if (it->index != entry->e_name_index ||
- it->name.len != entry->e_name_len)
- return -ENOATTR;
- it->infix_len = 0;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int xattr_namematch(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- unsigned int processed, char *buf, unsigned int len)
-{
- if (memcmp(buf, it->name.name + it->infix_len + processed, len))
- return -ENOATTR;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int xattr_checkbuffer(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- unsigned int value_sz)
-{
- int err = it->buffer_size < value_sz ? -ERANGE : 0;
-
- it->buffer_ofs = value_sz;
- return !it->buffer ? 1 : err;
-}
-
-static void xattr_copyvalue(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- unsigned int processed,
- char *buf, unsigned int len)
-{
- memcpy(it->buffer + processed, buf, len);
-}
-
-static const struct xattr_iter_handlers find_xattr_handlers = {
- .entry = xattr_entrymatch,
- .name = xattr_namematch,
- .alloc_buffer = xattr_checkbuffer,
- .value = xattr_copyvalue
-};
-
static bool erofs_xattr_user_list(struct dentry *dentry)
{
return test_opt(&EROFS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->opt, XATTR_USER);
@@ -370,20 +193,70 @@ const struct xattr_handler *erofs_xattr_handlers[] = {
NULL,
};
-static int xattr_entrylist(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
- struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry)
+typedef int (*erofs_xattr_body_handler)(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
+ unsigned int processed, char *buf, unsigned int len);
+
+static int erofs_xattr_namematch(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
+ unsigned int processed, char *buf, unsigned int len)
+{
+ if (memcmp(buf, it->name.name + it->infix_len + processed, len))
+ return -ENOATTR;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int erofs_xattr_copy(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
+ unsigned int unused, char *buf, unsigned int len)
+{
+ memcpy(it->buffer + it->buffer_ofs, buf, len);
+ it->buffer_ofs += len;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int erofs_xattr_body(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it, unsigned int len,
+ erofs_xattr_body_handler handler)
could we change erofs_xattr_body_handler into a bool (e.g.
bool copy_or_match)?
+{
+ unsigned int slice, processed = 0;
+
+ while (processed < len) {
+ int err = erofs_xattr_iter_fixup(it, true);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ slice = min_t(unsigned int, it->sb->s_blocksize - it->ofs,
+ len - processed);
+ err = handler(it, processed, it->kaddr + it->ofs, slice);
So that an indirect call could be avoided, as:
if (copy_or_match) {
memcpy(it->buffer + it->buffer_ofs, buf, len);
it->buffer_ofs += len;
} else if (memcmp(buf,
it->name.name + it->infix_len + processed, len)) {
return -ENOATTR;
}
?
Thanks,
Gao Xiang