Re: [PATCH] uml: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 8:23 AM Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>> arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/tuntap_user.c:149:17: error: implicit declaration of
> >>>> function 'strscpy'; did you mean 'strncpy'?
> >>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>     149 |                 strscpy(ifr.ifr_name, pri->dev_name,
> >>     sizeof(ifr.ifr_name));
> >>         |                 ^~~~~~~
> >>         |                 strncpy
> >>   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Ah, yeah, this is another "not actually in the kernel" cases. Let's ignore this
> > strlcpy for now.
>
> Well, actually it's another case of "not even compile tested". :-(

"But the AI said it was correct?!?" ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds