Re: [BUG: 6.3 kernel] Logitech Trackball M575 misidentified

[Bastien Nocera]

On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 14:33 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
Leemhuis) wrote:
> [CCing a few people and the the regression list, as it should be in
> the
> loop for regressions:
> https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html]
> 
> On 11.05.23 23:22, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > 
> > 6.3.2 kernel identifies "Logitech" "ERGO M575" as "Logitech"
> > "(\xc9_O\x04)",
> > 6.2.15 works fine.
> > 
> > 
> > 6.2.15 boot log:
> > input: Logitech ERGO M575 as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-
> > 1.3:1.2/0003:046D:C52B.0003/0003:046D:4096.0005/input/input15
> > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:4096.0005: input,hidraw1: USB HID
> > v1.11
> > Mouse [Logitech ERGO M575] on usb-0000:00:1a.0-1.3/input2:1
> > 
> > 6.3.2 boot log:
> > input: Logitech \xc9_O\x04 as
> > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-
> > 1.3:1.2/0003:046D:C52B.0003/0003:046D:4096.0005/input/input15
> > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:4096.0005: input,hidraw2: USB HID
> > v1.11
> > Mouse [Logitech \xc9_O\x04] on usb-0000:00:1a.0-1.3/input2:1
> 
> I wonder if this if this is some related to this issue:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217412
> ("Since kernel 6.3.1 logitech unify receiver not working properly")
> 
> That one so far seems to be ignored by the developers. Your report
> one
> also didn't get any reply yet.
> 
> Could you maybe perform a bisection to get down to this?
> 
> Side note: there is also
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217330
> ("Broken Logitech unifying battery names in hid-next tree")

The device name problem is tracked in 217330, which I filed.

A bisection would definitely help me if you have time, otherwise I'll
get to it, but it's probably not going to be before a couple of weeks.

You can also test this patch on top of the latest kernel tree:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/patch/20230531082428.21763-1-hadess@xxxxxxxxxx/
although I don't expect it to make a difference.

Cheers

> 
> 
> Anyway, for the rest of this mail:
> 
> [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
> regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
> paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
> See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
> 
> Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the
> cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel
> regression
> tracking bot:
> 
> #regzbot ^introduced v6.2..v6.3
> #regzbot title input: Logitech Trackball M575 misidentified
> #regzbot ignore-activity
> 
> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify
> when
> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
> something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
> while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed
> in
> the footer of this mail.
> 
> Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags
> pointing
> to the report (the parent of this mail). See page linked in footer
> for
> details.
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker'
> hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.