[PATCH 2/9] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Wed May 31 2023 - 06:18:07 EST


This makes the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index f71fac422c8f..1693ea22ef1b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_entrain(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
smp_mb(); /* Ensure counts are updated before callback is entrained. */
rhp->next = NULL;
for (i = RCU_NEXT_TAIL; i > RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
- if (rsclp->tails[i] != rsclp->tails[i - 1])
+ if (!rcu_segcblist_segempty(rsclp, i))
break;
rcu_segcblist_inc_seglen(rsclp, i);
WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[i], rhp);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_accelerate(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, unsigned long seq)
* as their ->gp_seq[] grace-period completion sequence number.
*/
for (i = RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL; i > RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
- if (rsclp->tails[i] != rsclp->tails[i - 1] &&
+ if (!rcu_segcblist_segempty(rsclp, i) &&
ULONG_CMP_LT(rsclp->gp_seq[i], seq))
break;

--
2.40.1